...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management >The rise of ‘professional staff’ and demise of the ‘non-academic’: a study of university staffing nomenclature preferences
【24h】

The rise of ‘professional staff’ and demise of the ‘non-academic’: a study of university staffing nomenclature preferences

机译:“专业职员”的兴起和“非学术”的消亡:对大学职员名称命名偏好的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Concerns regarding the nomenclature of university administration in Australia and the UK have featured in the higher education literature for over a decade. In response, a significant nomenclature shift is occurring, with Australian universities replacing the term ‘General Staff’ to describe all administrative and technical staff, in favour of ‘Professional Staff’. Following nomenclature trends in the UK, this change has been in gestation for some time having been championed by individuals, groups, professional associations and more recently a national staff union. This paper presents the findings of a doctoral study regarding the nomenclature preferences of 194 Australian university research support staff. It provides insight into the motivations behind the nomenclature shift, with an emphasis on the dissatisfaction expressed for the term ‘Non-Academic Staff’. Drawing on these findings, this paper suggests an aspirational framework for university professional staff in the form of a ‘nomenclature ladder’ for sector-wide application.View full textDownload full textKeywordsgeneral staff, nomenclature, non-academic, occupational identity, professionalisation, professional staff, research administration, university administrationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.715994
机译:十多年来,有关澳大利亚和英国大学行政管理术语的担忧已出现在高等教育文献中。为此,澳大利亚大学开始用术语“一般职员”来代替所有行政和技术人员,以“专业职员”代替,这是一个重大的术语转换。随着英国命名法的发展,这种改变已经酝酿了一段时间,受到个人,团体,专业协会以及最近的全国员工工会的拥护。本文介绍了有关194名澳大利亚大学研究支持人员的术语偏好的博士研究结果。它提供了对术语转换背后的动机的洞察力,并着重强调了对“非学术人员”一词表示的不满。根据这些发现,本文提出了一种“专业阶梯”形式的大学专业人才的理想框架,以在整个行业中应用。查看全文下载全文关键字一般职员,术语,非学术性,职业认同,专业化,专业人员,研究管理,大学行政管理相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid: “ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.715994

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号