首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Further and Higher Education >A transnational comparison of lecturer self-efficacy
【24h】

A transnational comparison of lecturer self-efficacy

机译:讲师自我效能感的跨国比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Benchmarking within higher education is now relatively commonplace, as institutions increasingly compete directly with one another to improve the overall ‘quality’ of what they do and attempt to establish and better their position among peers as measured against sector standards. The benchmarking of confidence among academic staff in relation to the skills associated with teaching, research and service tasks, at least as far as these three core functions are traditionally conceived and understood, is, however, an underdeveloped and somewhat sensitive field. In this article, findings from just such a self-efficacy benchmark study involving colleagues in the Education and Arts disciplines of one large Australian university and one relatively small English university college are presented for the first time. Responses were obtained from 132 participating lecturers across these institutions using a recently introduced 70-item self-efficacy questionnaire founded in social cognitive theory. Despite their obvious differences in size and cultural context, outcomes both within and between institutions/disciplines were remarkably similar in their apparent ‘strengths’ and ‘weaknesses’, particularly so in Education, with reported greater self-efficacy for teaching than for research and service tasks, which together lagged some distance behind. Within the various subscales and individual items of the questionnaire, particular challenges were observed in many of the more fundamental skills attached to research. As institutions which recognise the varied contributions their academic staff make towards achieving their missions, albeit with an eye on ‘performance’, the diagnostic value of the self-efficacy questionnaire as a transnational benchmarking tool is considered and outcomes are discussed in terms of their individual and departmental implications, particularly with regard to informing strategic decision-making in resource allocation and continuing professional development.View full textDownload full textKeywordsbenchmarking, comparative education, professional development, job skills, self-efficacyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.614932
机译:高等教育中的基准化现在相对司空见惯,因为各机构之间越来越直接地相互竞争以提高其工作的整体“质量”,并试图根据行业标准来建立和改善其在同行中的地位。然而,至少就传统上构想和理解的这三个核心功能而言,学术人员对与教学,研究和服务任务相关的技能的信心基准是一个不发达且有些敏感的领域。在本文中,首次展示了一项自我效能基准研究的结果,该研究涉及一所澳大利亚大型大学和一所相对较小的英国大学学院的教育和艺术学科的同事。使用最近引入的基于社会认知理论的70项自我效能感问卷调查表,从这些机构的132名与会讲师中获得了反馈。尽管在规模和文化背景上存在明显差异,但机构/学科内部和学科之间的结果在其明显的“优势”和“弱点”方面非常相似,尤其是在教育领域,据报道其自我效能更高教学而不是研究和服务任务,这两者相差了一些。在问卷的各个分量表和单个项目中,研究附带的许多更基本的技能都面临着特殊的挑战。作为承认其学术人员为实现其使命而做出的各种贡献的机构,尽管着眼于“绩效”,自我效能感调查表作为跨国基准工具的诊断价值被考虑在内,并讨论了成果他们的个人和部门影响,尤其是在为资源分配和持续专业发展提供战略决策方面的信息。查看全文下载全文关键词基准测试,比较教育,职业发展,工作技能,自我效能感相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor &Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.614932

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号