首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Comparison of Automated BAX PCR and Standard Culture Methods for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Blue Crabmeat (Callinectus sapidus) and Blue Crab Processing Plants
【24h】

Comparison of Automated BAX PCR and Standard Culture Methods for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Blue Crabmeat (Callinectus sapidus) and Blue Crab Processing Plants

机译:自动化BAX PCR与标准培养方法检测蓝蟹肉(Callinectus sapidus)和蓝蟹加工厂中单核细胞增生李斯特菌的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study compared the automated BAX PCR with the standard culture method (SCM) to detect Listeria monocytogenes in blue crab processing plants. Raw crabs, crabmeat, and environmental sponge samples were collected monthly from seven processing plants during the plant operating season, May through November 2006. For detection of L. monocytogenes in raw crabs and crabmeat, enrichment was performed in Listeria enrichment broth, whereas for environmental samples, demi-Fraser broth was used, and then plating on both Oxford agar and L. monocytogenes plating medium was done. Enriched samples were also analyzed by BAX PCR. A total of 960 samples were examined; 59 were positive by BAX PCR and 43 by SCM. Overall, there was no significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) between the methods for detecting the presence of L. monocytogenes in samples collected from crab processing plants. Twenty-two and 18 raw crab samples were positive for L. monocytogenes by SCM and BAX PCR, respectively. Twenty and 32 environmental samples were positive for L. monocytogenes by SCM and BAX PCR, respectively, whereas only one and nine finished products were positive. The sensitivities of BAX PCR for detecting L. monocytogenes in raw crabs, crabmeat, and environmental samples were 59.1, 100, and 60%, respectively. The results of this study indicate that BAX PCR is as sensitive as SCM for detecting L. monocytogenes in crabmeat, but more sensitive than SCM for detecting this bacterium in raw crabs and environmental samples.
机译:这项研究将自动BAX PCR与标准培养方法(SCM)进行了比较,以检测蓝蟹加工厂中的李斯特菌。在工厂运营季节(2006年5月至2006年11月),每月从七个加工厂采集生蟹,蟹肉和环境海绵样品。为检测生蟹和蟹肉中的单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌,在李斯特菌富集肉汤中进行了富集,而对于环境样品,使用demi-Fraser肉汤,然后在牛津琼脂和单核细胞增生李斯特菌平板培养基上进行平板接种。还通过BAX PCR分析了富集的样品。总共检查了960个样品。 BAX PCR阳性59例,SCM阳性43例。总体而言,从螃蟹加工厂收集的样品中检测单核细胞增生李斯特菌的方法之间没有显着差异(P≤0.05)。通过SCM和BAX PCR检测,分别有22和18个生蟹样品的单核细胞增生李斯特菌阳性。通过SCM和BAX PCR分别检测出20个和32个环境样品的单核细胞增生李斯特菌阳性,而成品中只有一个和九个阳性。 BAX PCR检测生蟹,蟹肉和环境样品中单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌的敏感性分别为59.1%,100%和60%。这项研究的结果表明,BAX PCR在检测蟹肉中的单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌方面与SCM一样灵敏,但在生蟹和环境样品中检测这种细菌的敏感性比SCM敏感。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2011年第11期|p.1930-1933|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Food Science and Technology Program, Department of Agriculture, Food and Resource Sciences, 2116 Center for Food Science and Technology,University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland 21853;

    Food Science and Technology Program, Department of Agriculture, Food and Resource Sciences, 2116 Center for Food Science and Technology,University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland 21853;

    Food Science and Technology Program, Department of Agriculture, Food and Resource Sciences, 2116 Center for Food Science and Technology,University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland 21853;

    Food Science and Technology Program, Department of Agriculture, Food and Resource Sciences, 2116 Center for Food Science and Technology,University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland 21853;

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Station,Eastern Regional Research Center, Microbial Food Safety Research Unit, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号