首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Screening of Fruit Products for Norovirus and the Difficulty of Interpreting Positive PCR Results
【24h】

Screening of Fruit Products for Norovirus and the Difficulty of Interpreting Positive PCR Results

机译:诺如病毒的水果产品筛选和PCR阳性结果解释的难度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite recent norovirus (NoV) outbreaks related to consumption of fruit products, little is known regarding the NoV load on these foods. Therefore, 75 fruit products were screened for NoV presence by using an evaluated in-house NoV detection methodology consisting of a NoV extraction method and a reverse transcription quantitative PCR assay. Additionally, the fruit samples were screened for bacterial pathogens and bacterial hygiene indicators. Results of the NoV screening showed that 18 of 75 samples tested positive for GI and/or Gil NoV despite a good bacteriological quality. The recovery of murine norovirus 1 virus particles acting as process control was successful in 31 of 75 samples with a mean recovery efficiency of 11.32% ± 6.08%. The level of detected NoV genomic copies ranged between 2.5 and 5.0 log per 10 g. NoV GI and/or GII were found in 4 of 10, 7 of 30, 6 of 20, and 1 of 15 of the tested raspberries, cherry tomatoes, strawberries, and fruit salad samples, respectively. However, confirmation of the positive quantitative PCR results by sequencing genotyping regions in the NoV genome was not possible. Due to the nature of the method used (reverse transcription quantitative PCR) for detection of genomic material, no differentiation was possible between infectious and noninfectious viral particles. No NoV outbreaks related to the tested fruit product types were reported during the screening period, which hampers a conclusion as to whether these unexpected high numbers of NoV-positive results should be perceived as a public health threat. These results, however, may indicate a prior NoV contamination of the tested food samples throughout the fresh produce chain.
机译:尽管最近爆发了与食用水果产品有关的诺如病毒(NoV),但对于这些食物中的NoV含量知之甚少。因此,通过使用由NoV提取方法和逆转录定量PCR分析组成的内部评估NoV检测方法,筛选了75种水果产品中是否存在NoV。另外,对水果样品进行细菌病原体和细菌卫生指标的筛选。 NoV筛选的结果显示,尽管细菌学质量良好,但在75个样品中有18个的GI和/或Gil NoV检测为阳性。在75个样品中的31个中,成功回收了用作过程控制的鼠源诺如病毒1病毒颗粒,平均回收率为11.32%±6.08%。每10 g检测到的NoV基因组拷贝水平介于2.5和5.0 log之间。 NoV GI和/或GII分别在测试的覆盆子,樱桃番茄,草莓和水果沙拉样本中的10个中的4个,30个中的7个,20个中的6个和15个中的1个被发现。但是,不可能通过对NoV基因组中的基因分型区域进行测序来确认阳性定量PCR结果。由于用于检测基因组材料的方法的性质(逆转录定量PCR),在传染性和非传染性病毒颗粒之间无法进行区分。在筛选期间未报告与受测水果产品类型相关的NoV暴发,这阻碍了关于是否应将这些意想不到的大量NoV阳性结果视为对公共健康的威胁的结论。但是,这些结果可能表明在整个新鲜农产品链中,被测食品样品先前发生了NoV污染。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2011年第3期|425-431|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering,Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;

    Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering,Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;

    Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering,Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;

    Technology and Food Science Unit, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research,Flemish Government, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090 Melle, Belgium;

    Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering,Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号