首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Quantitative Data Analysis To Determine Best Food Cooling Practices in U.S. Restaurants
【24h】

Quantitative Data Analysis To Determine Best Food Cooling Practices in U.S. Restaurants

机译:定量数据分析以确定美国餐厅的最佳食品冷藏做法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that improper cooling practices contributed to more than 500 foodborne illness outbreaks associated with restaurants or delis in the United States between 1998 and 2008. CDC's Environmental Health Specialists Network (EHS-Net) personnel collected data in approximately 50 randomly selected restaurants in nine EHS-Net sites in 2009 to 2010 and measured the temperatures of cooling food at the beginning and the end of the observation period. Those beginning and ending points were used to estimate cooling rates. The most common cooling method was refrigeration, used in 48% of cooling steps. Other cooling methods included ice baths (19%), room-temperature cooling (17%), ice-wand cooling (7%), and adding ice or frozen food to the cooling food as an ingredient (2%). Sixty-five percent of cooling observations had an estimated cooling rate that was compliant with the 2009 Food and Drug Administration Food Code guideline (cooling to 41°F [5℃] in 6 h). Large cuts of meat and stews had the slowest overall estimated cooling rate, approximately equal to that specified in the Food Code guideline. Pasta and noodles were the fastest cooling foods, with a cooling time of just over 2 h. Foods not being actively monitored by food workers were more than twice as likely to cool more slowly than recommended in the Food Code guideline. Food stored at a depth greater than 7.6 cm (3 in.) was twice as likely to cool more slowly than specified in the Food Code guideline. Unventilated cooling foods were almost twice as likely to cool more slowly than specified in the Food Code guideline. Our data suggest that several best cooling practices can contribute to a proper cooling process. Inspectors unable to assess the full cooling process should consider assessing specific cooling practices as an alternative. Future research could validate our estimation method and study the effect of specific practices on the full cooling process.
机译:疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)收集的数据表明,不正确的制冷做法在1998年至2008年期间导致了500多次与饭店或熟食店有关的食源性疾病暴发。CDC的环境健康专家网络(EHS-Net) 2009年至2010年,工作人员在9个EHS-Net站点的约50家随机选择的餐馆中收集了数据,并在观察期开始和结束时测量了冷却食品的温度。这些起点和终点用于估计冷却速度。最常见的冷却方法是制冷,在48%的冷却步骤中使用。其他冷却方法包括冰浴(19%),室温冷却(17%),冰块冷却(7%)以及向冷却食品中添加冰或冷冻食品作为成分(2%)。约有65%的冷却观测结果表明,其估计的冷却速率符合2009年美国食品药品监督管理局食品法典准则(在6小时内冷却至41°F [5℃])。大块肉和炖菜的总体估计冷却速度最慢,大约等于《食品法典》准则中指定的速度。意大利面和面条是最快的冷却食品,冷却时间仅超过2小时。没有得到食品工人积极监控的食品,其降温速度比《食品法典》指南中建议的慢两倍。存放在大于7.6厘米(3英寸)的深度处的食物,其冷却速度要比《食品法典》规定的慢两倍。不通风的凉爽食品冷却的速度几乎比《食品法典》规定的慢两倍。我们的数据表明,几种最佳的冷却方法可有助于适当的冷却过程。无法评估整个冷却过程的检查人员应考虑评估特定的冷却方法。未来的研究可以验证我们的估算方法,并研究特定实践对整个冷却过程的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2015年第4期|778-783|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Food Science Department, Rutgers University, 65 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901;

    National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MS F60, 4770 Buford Highway, Chamblee, Georgia 30341;

    Metro Nashville/Davidson County Public Health Department, 311 23rd Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee 37203;

    Minnesota Department of Health, 12 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 2105, Mankato, Minnesota 56001;

    Minnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55164;

    Rhode Island Department of Health, 3 Capitol Hill, Cannon Building, Room 203, Providence, Rhode Island 02908;

    New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Community Environmental Health and Food Protection, Corning Tower, Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12237, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:25:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号