首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Comparison of Stomaching versus Rinsing for Recovering Bacterial Communities from Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Fillets
【24h】

Comparison of Stomaching versus Rinsing for Recovering Bacterial Communities from Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Fillets

机译:从虹鳟鱼中恢复细菌社区的胃癌与漂洗的比较(Oncorhynchus mykiss)鱼片

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of high-throughput methods allows a better characterization of food-related bacterial communities. However, such methods require large amounts of high-quality bacterial DNA, which may be a challenge when dealing with a complex matrix that has a low concentration of bacteria, such as fresh fish fillets. Therefore, the choice of method used to recover bacteria from a food matrix in a cost-effective way is critical, yet little information is available on the performance of commonly used methods. We assessed the recovery capacity of two such methods: stomaching and mechanical rinsing. The efficiency of the methods was evaluated through quantitative recovery and compatibility with end-point quantitative PCR (qPCR). Fresh rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fillets were inoculated with a bacterial marker, Brochothrix thermosphacta, at different concentrations (7.52 to 1.52 log CFU/g). The fillets were processed by one of the two methods, and the recovery of the marker in the suspensions was assessed by plate counting and qPCR targeting B. thermosphacta-rpoC. The same analyses were performed on six noninoculated fresh fillets. Stomaching and mechanical rinsing allowed efficient and repeatable recovery of the bacterial communities from the 42 inoculated fillets. No significant differences in recovery ratios were observed between the marker enumerated in the inoculation suspensions and in the corresponding recovery suspensions after rinsing and stomaching. However, the stomaching method allowed too many particles to pass through the filters bag, making necessary a limiting supplementary filtration step. As a consequence, only the rinsing recovery method allowed proper PCR quantification of the inoculated B. thermosphacta. The mean recovered bacterial level of the fillets was approximately 3 log CFU/g. It seems more relevant and cost-effective to recover the endogenous bacterial microbiota of a fish fillet structure using the rinsing method rather than the stomaching method.
机译:使用高通量方法允许更好地表征食物相关的细菌社区。然而,这些方法需要大量的高质量细菌DNA,当处理具有低浓度细菌的复杂基质时可能是挑战,例如鲜鱼圆角。因此,使用以成本效益的方式从食物基质中回收细菌的方法的选择是至关重要的,但很少的信息可用于常用方法的性能。我们评估了两种这些方法的恢复能力:胃刺和机械漂洗。通过定量回收和与终点定量PCR(QPCR)的相容评估方法的效率。用细菌标记物,在不同浓度(7.52-1.52对数CFU / g)中,用细菌标记物,细菌标记物(7.52至1.52 log cfu / g)接种新鲜彩虹鳟鱼片(Oncorynchus mykiss)圆角。通过两种方法之一加工圆角,通过板计数和QPCR靶向B. Thermosphotta-RPOC评估悬浮液中标记物的回收率。在六个非常规的新鲜圆角下进行相同的分析。胃肠和机械漂洗允许从42个接种的圆角的细菌群体的有效和可重复恢复。在接种悬浮液中枚举的标记物中没有观察到恢复比的显着差异,并在冲洗和胃肠后相应的回收悬浮液之间。然而,胃合方法允许过多的颗粒通过过滤器袋,使得必要的限制补充过滤步骤。因此,仅漂洗回收方法允许接种B.热磷酸酯的适当PCR定量。圆角的平均回收细菌水平约为3个log cfu / g。使用漂洗方法而不是胃酸法恢复鱼片结构的内源性细菌微生物群更相关和成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号