首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Facilities Management >Quantitative validation of budgeting methods and suggestion of a new calculation method for the determination of maintenance costs
【24h】

Quantitative validation of budgeting methods and suggestion of a new calculation method for the determination of maintenance costs

机译:预算方法的定量验证和确定维护成本的新计算方法的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to offer a critical analysis of today's most common calculation methods for maintenance budgets in Europe. The methods are quantitatively validated using the real lifecycle data of 17 exemplary buildings. As a result, a new approach for the budgeting of maintenance measures is suggested which helps to define the real budgeting costs more accurately. Design/methodology/approach – The paper starts with a theoretical definition and critical discussion of the different budgeting methods. All methods are quantitatively validated using real data analysis. Analysed is the lifecycle data of 17 school or office buildings. The maintenance costs previously calculated using the existing calculation methods can thus be contrasted with the real maintenance costs and validated. The development of a new calculation method aims at the elimination of the shortcomings of the existing methods. Findings – The paper finds that the calculation methods used today are only partially suitable for the prediction of the financial requirements of building maintenance. Real-life building maintenance costs follow certain cycles and change considerably over time. Recently, calculation methods particularly underestimate the first big maintenance peak which is reached approximately 30 years after a building's construction. It also became clear that it is essential to include certain influencing factors into the calculation, as the analytical methods do. The findings lead to the development of a new calculation method called practical adaptive budgeting of maintenance measures. This method is the first to differentiate between annual and one-off maintenance measures and includes empirically determined correcting factors to take into account specific building characteristics. Research limitations/implications – This paper's findings refer to the examination of 17 sample buildings. In order to be able to generalise the results, more research needs to be done using a higher number of sample buildings. Practical implications – This paper contributes to the improvement of the prospective calculation of maintenance budgets. The new calculation method is the first to enable maintenance experts to determine their maintenance budgets in a transparent and scientific way so that the required financial means to carry out necessary maintenance measures can be made available at the right time. Originality/value – Based on real maintenance data, it becomes possible for the first time to verify and validate theoretic calculation approaches from literature. The results are new findings that are useful in science as well as in real life.
机译:目的–本文的目的是对欧洲当今维护预算最常用的计算方法进行批判性分析。使用17个示例性建筑物的真实生命周期数据对方法进行了定量验证。结果,提出了一种用于维护措施预算的新方法,该方法有助于更准确地定义实际预算成本。设计/方法/方法–本文从理论定义和对不同预算方法的批判性讨论开始。所有方法均使用真实数据分析进行了定量验证。分析了17所学校或办公楼的生命周期数据。因此,可以将先前使用现有计算方法计算出的维护成本与实际维护成本进行对比并进行验证。一种新的计算方法的开发旨在消除现有方法的缺点。结论–本文发现,当今使用的计算方法仅部分适合预测建筑物维护的财务需求。现实生活中的建筑物维护成本会遵循某些周期,并且会随着时间的推移而发生很大变化。最近,计算方法特别低估了建筑物建造后大约30年达到的第一个大维护高峰。显然,就像分析方法一样,必须将某些影响因素包括在计算中。这些发现导致开发了一种新的计算方法,称为维护措施的实用自适应预算。该方法是第一种区分年度维护措施和一次性维护措施的方法,它包括根据经验确定的校正因子,以考虑到特定的建筑特征。研究的局限性/意义–本文的研究结果涉及对17个样本建筑物的检查。为了能够概括结果,需要使用更多的样本建筑物进行更多的研究。实际意义–本文有助于改进维护预算的预期计算。这种新的计算方法是第一个使维护专家能够以透明和科学的方式确定其维护预算的方法,从而可以在适当的时候提供执行必要的维护措施所需的财务手段。原创性/价值–基于实际维护数据,首次有可能验证和验证来自文献的理论计算方法。结果是对科学以及现实生活都有用的新发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号