首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Experimental Criminology >Implementing randomized experiments in criminal justice settings: An evaluation of multi-systemic therapy in the Netherlands
【24h】

Implementing randomized experiments in criminal justice settings: An evaluation of multi-systemic therapy in the Netherlands

机译:在刑事司法环境中实施随机实验:荷兰的多系统疗法评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper addresses several issues that we encountered when implementing a randomized experiment to evaluate a promising intervention for serious juvenile delinquents, multi-systemic therapy (MST). The issues overlap with issues others experienced when trying to conduct randomized experiments in clinical practice, but are complicated because MST takes place in a legal context. The complex juvenile justice system makes it difficult to come up with a simple system of randomization. Problems encountered are the complexity of the referral process in this type of intervention, legal issues and the ethical concerns raised by clinicians. Our experiences might be useful to others planning to carry out a randomized efficacy study within the juvenile justice system. Firstly, other researchers might feel supported if they realize that others experience similar problems, and, secondly, we provide some concrete suggestions concerning the following: selecting the procedures and determining the moment of randomization, dealing with and overcoming the resistance of institutions involved, maintaining the cooperation of both the institution and the sample, and keeping turnover of research staff to a minimum.
机译:本文讨论了我们在实施随机实验以评估严重的青少年犯罪,多系统治疗(MST)的有希望的干预措施时遇到的几个问题。这些问题与尝试在临床实践中进行随机实验时遇到的其他问题重叠,但由于MST发生在法律环境中,因此很复杂。复杂的少年司法制度使得很难提出一个简单的随机制度。遇到的问题是这种干预中转诊过程的复杂性,法律问题以及临床医生提出的道德问题。我们的经验可能对计划在青少年司法系统内进行随机功效研究的其他人有用。首先,如果其他研究人员意识到其他人也遇到类似的问题,则可能会感到支持;其次,我们针对以下方面提供一些具体建议:选择程序并确定随机化的时刻,应对和克服相关机构的阻力,维持机构和样本的合作,并尽量减少研究人员的流动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号