首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice >Formal and Informal Crime Control Views in Nigeria and the United States: An Exploratory Study Among College Students
【24h】

Formal and Informal Crime Control Views in Nigeria and the United States: An Exploratory Study Among College Students

机译:尼日利亚和美国的正式和非正式犯罪控制观点:大学生探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Formal and informal crime control is used to deter individuals from engaging in criminal behavior. Formal crime control relies on the law and official government agencies to curb criminal actions. Informal crime control relies on moral and social institutions (e.g., family or church) to promote lawful behavior. This study examined the importance of formal and informal crime control in Nigeria and the United States. Using the data collected from 758 college students, the study found that the Nigerian and U.S. respondents differed on most of the formal and informal control questions. Nigerian respondents were more likely to feel that the formal control mechanisms of the police and law deterred crime, whereas U.S. respondents were more supportive of the courts and prisons as effective forms of control. Nigerian students were more likely to feel that shame, neighborhood watches, and surveillance by neighbors were effective forms of informal social control. Both Nigerian and U.S. respondents felt that being rejected by family, neighbors, and peers was effective at deterring crime except for repeat offenders when formal punishment was viewed as being more effective. When asked to rank formal and informal crime control mechanisms, Nigerian students ranked family first, followed by corrections, courts, police, neighborhood, peers, and schools. U.S. students ranked family first, followed by police, corrections, courts, peers, schools, and neighborhood.View full textDownload full textKEYTERMSFormal crime control, informal crime control, college students’ views, Nigeria, the United StatesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15377931003761037
机译:正式和非正式的犯罪控制被用来阻止个人从事犯罪行为。正式的犯罪控制依靠法律和官方政府机构来遏制犯罪行为。非正式犯罪控制依靠道德和社会制度(例如家庭或教堂)来促进合法行为。这项研究探讨了尼日利亚和美国进行正式和非正式犯罪控制的重要性。使用从758名大学生那里收集的数据,该研究发现,在大多数正式和非正式控制问题上,尼日利亚和美国受访者有所不同。尼日利亚受访者更有可能认为警察和法律的正式控制机制阻止了犯罪活动,而美国受访者则更支持法院和监狱作为有效的控制形式。尼日利亚学生更有可能感到羞耻,邻居监视和邻居监视是非正式社会控制的有效形式。尼日利亚和美国的受访者都认为,遭到家人,邻居和同伴的拒绝可以有效地遏制犯罪,但重复犯罪者被视为正式处罚更为有效,但屡犯者除外。当被要求对正式和非正式犯罪控制机制进行排名时,尼日利亚学生在家庭中排名第一,其次是惩戒,法院,警察,社区,同伴和学校。美国学生在家庭中排名第一,其次是警察,惩戒,法院,同龄人,学校和附近地区。查看全文下载全文关键术语正式犯罪控制,非正式犯罪控制,大学生意见,尼日利亚,美国相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand: “泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15377931003761037

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号