首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health >Assessing psychosocial/quality of life outcomes in screening: how do we do it better?
【24h】

Assessing psychosocial/quality of life outcomes in screening: how do we do it better?

机译:评估筛查的社会心理/生活质量:我们如何做得更好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

High quality research on the psychosocial outcomes of screening programmes is urgently needed. Assessing non-medical outcomes of screening presents constant challenges. Marteau and colleagues offor some insight into the complexities of assessing non-medical outcomes in their study of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening. The paper reports that self assessed health (SAH) was lower among men who were found to have an aortic aneurysm than men who did not, yet baseline measurement indicated that much of this difference prc-datcd screening. Poorer SAH seemed to predict having an aortic aneurysm. The authors suggest that the findings have implications for the methods used to assess psychological impact of screening tests and warn us not to erroneously conclude that poorer outcomes are necessarily a product of screening, if baseline differences are not assessed.
机译:迫切需要对筛查程序的社会心理结果进行高质量的研究。评估筛查的非医学结果提出了持续的挑战。 Marteau及其同事对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查研究中评估非医疗结果的复杂性有一些见解。该论文报告说,发现患有主动脉瘤的男性的自我评估健康(SAH)低于未评估其健康的男性,但是基线测量结果表明,这种预后筛查的差异很大。 SAH较差似乎预示着主动脉瘤。作者认为,这些发现对评估筛查测试的心理影响的方法具有影响,并警告我们不要错误地得出结论:如果未评估基线差异,则较差的结果必然是筛查的产物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号