首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health >Uses of 'Good Laboratory Practices' by regulated industry and agencies, and the safety of bisphenol A
【24h】

Uses of 'Good Laboratory Practices' by regulated industry and agencies, and the safety of bisphenol A

机译:受监管的行业和机构对“良好实验室规范”的使用以及双酚A的安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As the argument about the risk of the ubiquitous plastic chemical bisphenol A (BPA) continues,~1 we should recall that every toxic chemical is regulated the same way: with its key safety data supplied by the manufacturer with typically millions to billions of revenue a year riding on that safety question. In fact, for many years no chemical risk assessment (RA) performed for premar-keting safety testing has used any but the data supplied by the chemical's manufacturer, for the key toxicity studies which determine a chemical's alleged low or no observable adverse effect level (1/NOAEL) (nor have many RAs on chemicals already on the market). Hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed, published findings-of much higher quality than the industry's financially conflicted data-have been ignored.
机译:随着关于无处不在的塑料化学品双酚A(BPA)风险的争论持续不断,〜1我们应该回想一下,每种有毒化学品的监管方式都相同:制造商提供的关键安全数据通常为数百万至数十亿美元一年的安全问题。实际上,多年来,除预先确定化学品制造商提供的数据外,没有进行任何化学品风险评估(RA)来进行预先市场安全测试(RA)用于确定该化学品所谓的低或没有可观察到的不良反应水平的关键毒性研究( 1 / NOAEL)(市场上也没有许多针对化学品的RA)。成千上万的经过同行评审,已发表的调查结果(质量比行业财务上有争议的数据高得多)已被忽略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号