首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health Perspectives >Why Public Health Agencies Cannot Depend on Good Laboratory Practices as a Criterion for Selecting Data: The Case of Bisphenol A
【2h】

Why Public Health Agencies Cannot Depend on Good Laboratory Practices as a Criterion for Selecting Data: The Case of Bisphenol A

机译:为什么公共卫生机构不能依靠良好的实验室规范作为选择数据的标准:双酚A

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background In their safety evaluations of bisphenol A (BPA), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and a counterpart in Europe, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), have given special prominence to two industry-funded studies that adhered to standards defined by Good Laboratory Practices (GLP). These same agencies have given much less weight in risk assessments to a large number of independently replicated non-GLP studies conducted with government funding by the leading experts in various fields of science from around the world.
机译:背景技术美国食品药品管理局(FDA)和欧洲同行欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)在对双酚A(BPA)的安全性评估中,特别强调了两项符合标准的行业资助研究由良好实验室规范(GLP)定义。这些相同的机构对风险评估的重视程度要低得多,这些风险评估是由世界各地各个科学领域的领先专家在政府资助下进行的,大量独立复制的非GLP研究。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号