...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Mining and biodiversity offsets: A transparent and science-based approach to measure 'no-net-loss'
【24h】

Mining and biodiversity offsets: A transparent and science-based approach to measure 'no-net-loss'

机译:采矿和生物多样性抵消:一种透明的,基于科学的方法来衡量“无净损失”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Mining and associated infrastructure developments can present themselves as economic opportunities that are difficult to forego for developing and industrialised countries alike. Almost inevitably, however, they lead to biodiversity loss. This trade-off can be greatest in economically poor but highly biodiverse regions. Biodiversity offsets have, therefore, increasingly been promoted as a mechanism to help achieve both the aims of development and biodiversity conservation. Accordingly, this mechanism is emerging as a key tool for multinational mining companies to demonstrate good environmental stewardship. Relying on offsets to achieve "no-net-loss" of biodiversity, however, requires certainty in their ecological integrity where they are used to sanction habitat destruction. Here, we discuss real-world practices in biodiversity offsetting by assessing how well some leading initiatives internationally integrate critical aspects of biodiversity attributes, net loss accounting and project management. With the aim of improving, rather than merely critiquing the approach, we analyse different aspects of biodiversity offsetting. Further, we analyse the potential pitfalls of developing counterfactual scenarios of biodiversity loss or gains in a project's absence. In this, we draw on insights from experience with carbon offsetting. This informs our discussion of realistic projections of project effectiveness and permanence of benefits to ensure no net losses, and the risk of displacing, rather than avoiding biodiversity losses ("leakage"). We show that the most prominent existing biodiversity offset initiatives employ broad and somewhat arbitrary parameters to measure habitat value and do not sufficiently consider real-world challenges in compensating losses in an effective and lasting manner. We propose a more transparent and science-based approach, supported with a new formula, to help design biodiversity offsets to realise their potential in enabling more responsible mining that better balances economic development opportunities for mining and biodiversity conservation.
机译:采矿和相关基础设施的发展可以将自身呈现为经济机遇,而发展中国家和工业化国家都难以放弃。但是,它们几乎不可避免地导致生物多样性的丧失。这种权衡在经济贫困但生物多样性高的地区可能是最大的。因此,越来越多地促进了生物多样性补偿,以此作为一种机制来帮助实现发展和生物多样性保护的目标。因此,这种机制正在成为跨国矿业公司展示良好环境管理的关键工具。但是,依靠补偿来实现生物多样性的“无净损失”需要确定其生态完整性,以便将其用于制裁生境破坏。在这里,我们通过评估一些领先的举措在国际上如何融合生物多样性属性,净损失核算和项目管理的关键方面,讨论了生物多样性抵消的现实做法。为了改进而不是仅仅批评该方法,我们分析了生物多样性抵消的不同方面。此外,我们分析了在缺乏项目的情况下发展生物多样性丧失或获取的反事实情景的潜在陷阱。在此,我们将从碳补偿的经验中汲取见解。这为我们讨论了有关项目有效性和收益永久性的现实预测提供了保证,以确保没有净损失,以及产生替代风险,而不是避免生物多样性损失(“泄漏”)的风险。我们表明,现有的最杰出的生物多样性补偿计划采用了广泛且有些武断的参数来衡量栖息地的价值,并且在有效,持久地补偿损失方面未充分考虑现实世界中的挑战。我们提出了一种更加透明和基于科学的方法,并辅以新的公式,以帮助设计生物多样性补偿,以实现其潜力,以实现更负责任的采矿,从而更好地平衡采矿和生物多样性保护的经济发展机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号