首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Comparative life cycle assessment of alternative strategies for energy recovery from used cooking oil
【24h】

Comparative life cycle assessment of alternative strategies for energy recovery from used cooking oil

机译:从使用过的食用油中回收能源的替代策略的比较生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The separate collection of Used Cooking Oil (UCO) is gaining popularity through several countries in Europe. An appropriate management of UCO waste stream leads to substantial benefits. In this study, we analyse two different possibilities of UCO energy reuse: the direct feed to a reciprocating internal combustion engine (ICE) for cogeneration purpose, and the processing to generate biodiesel. Concerning biodiesel production, we analyse four among conventional and innovative technologies, characterised by different type and amount of used chemicals, heat and electricity consumptions and yields. We perform a systematic evaluation of environmental benefits and drawbacks by applying life cycle assessment (LCA) analysis to compare the alternatives.For the impact assessment, two methods are selected: the Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Cumulative Exergy Consumption (CExC). Results related only to the processing phases (i.e. not including yet the avoided effects) show that the recovery of UCO in cogeneration plant has in general lower values in terms of environmental impacts than its employment in biodiesel production.When products and co-products substitution are included, the savings obtained by the substitution of conventional diesel production, in the biodiesel cases, are significantly higher than the avoided effects for electricity and heat in the cogeneration case. In particular, by using the UCO in the biodiesel production processes, the savings vary from 41.6 to 54.6 GJexper tUCO, and from 2270 to 2860 kg CO2eqper tUCO for CExC and GWP, respectively. A particular focus is put on sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Overall, high uncertainty of final results for process impacts is observed, especially for the supercritical methanol process. Low uncertainty values are evaluated for the avoided effects. Including the uncertain character of the impacts, cogeneration scenario and NaOH catalysed process of biodiesel production result to be the most suitable solutions from the process impacts and avoided effects perspective.
机译:旧的食用油(UCO)的单独收藏在欧洲的多个国家/地区越来越受欢迎。对UCO废物流的适当管理可带来可观的收益。在这项研究中,我们分析了UCO能量再利用的两种不同可能性:直接供入往复式内燃机(ICE)以进行热电联产,以及处理产生生物柴油的过程。关于生物柴油的生产,我们分析了传统技术和创新技术中的四种,其特点是所用化学药品的类型和数量,热和电的消耗量和产量。我们通过应用生命周期评估(LCA)分析以比较替代方案,对环境的利弊进行系统的评估。为进行影响评估,选择了两种方法:全球变暖潜势(GWP)和累积热能消耗(CExC)。仅与加工阶段有关的结果(即不包括尚未避免的影响)表明,在热电联产工厂中回收的UCO对环境的影响通常低于其在生物柴油生产中的使用价值。包括在内,在生物柴油的情况下,通过替代常规柴油生产而节省的成本明显高于在热电联产情况下避免的电和热影响。特别是,通过在生物柴油生产过程中使用UCO,分别为CExC和GWP节省了41.6至54.6 GJexper tUCO,从2270至2860 kg CO2eqper tUCO。特别关注灵敏度和不确定性分析。总体而言,观察到对工艺影响的最终结果具有很高的不确定性,尤其是对于超临界甲醇工艺而言。评估低不确定性值可避免产生影响。从过程影响和避免影响的角度出发,包括影响的不确定性,热电联产情景和NaOH催化的生物柴油生产过程,将是最合适的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号