首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >Transaction costs, communication and spatial coordination in Payment for Ecosystem Services Schemes
【24h】

Transaction costs, communication and spatial coordination in Payment for Ecosystem Services Schemes

机译:生态系统服务付款方案中的交易费用,通信和空间协调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Agricultural producer participation and spatial coordination of land use decisions are key components for enhancing the effective delivery of ecosystem services from private land. However, inducing participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services schemes for coordinating land management choices is challenging from a policy design perspective owing to transaction costs associated with participation. This paper employs a laboratory experiment to investigate the impact of such costs on participation and land use in the context of an Agglomeration Bonus (AB) scheme. The AB creates a coordination game with multiple Nash equilibria related to alternative spatially-coordinated land use patterns. The experiment varies transaction costs between two levels (high and low), which affects the risks and payoffs of coordinating on the different equilibria. Additionally, an option to communicate is implemented between neighbors arranged on a local network to facilitate spatial coordination. Results indicate a significant difference in participation and performance under high and low transaction costs, with lower uptake and performance when transaction costs are high. These effects are, however, impacted by transaction costs faced in the past Communication improves both AB participation rates and performance with the effect being greater for participants facing high transaction costs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:农业生产者的参与和土地使用决策的空间协调是增强私人土地上生态系统服务有效交付的关键组成部分。但是,由于与参与相关的交易成本,从政策设计的角度出发,促使人们参与生态系统服务付款方案以协调土地管理的选择具有挑战性。本文采用了一项实验室实验,以研究在集聚奖金(AB)计划下这些成本对参与和土地使用的影响。 AB建立了具有多种Nash均衡的协调游戏,这些均衡与替代的空间协调的土地利用模式有关。该实验在两个级别(高和低)之间改变交易成本,这会影响在不同均衡上进行协调的风险和收益。另外,在布置在局域网上的邻居之间实现了通信选项,以促进空间协调。结果表明,在高低交易成本下,参与度和绩效存在显着差异,而在高交易成本下,参与度和绩效则较低。但是,这些影响会受到过去所面临的交易成本的影响。Communication提高了AB参与率和绩效,对于面临高交易成本的参与者而言,影响更大。 (C)2017 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号