首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >The Prospects for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Vietnam: A Look at Three Payment Schemes
【2h】

The Prospects for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Vietnam: A Look at Three Payment Schemes

机译:越南的生态系统服务付款前景:三种付款计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Global conservation discourses and practices increasingly rely on market-based solutions to fulfill the dual objective of forest conservation and economic development. Although varied, these interventions are premised on the assumption that natural resources are most effectively managed and preserved while benefiting livelihoods if the market-incentives of a liberalised economy are correctly in place. By examining three nationally supported payment for ecosystem service (PES) schemes in Vietnam we show how insecure land tenure, high transaction costs and high opportunity costs can undermine the long-term benefits of PES programmes for local households and, hence, potentially threaten their livelihood viability. In many cases, the income from PES programmes does not reach the poor because of political and economic constraints. Local elite capture of PES benefits through the monopolization of access to forestland and existing state forestry management are identified as key problems. We argue that as PES schemes create a market for ecosystem services, such markets must be understood not simply as bald economic exchanges between ‘rational actors’ but rather as exchanges embedded in particular socio-political and historical contexts to support the sustainable use of forest resources and local livelihoods in Vietnam.
机译:全球保护的话语和实践越来越依赖于基于市场的解决方案来实现森林保护和经济发展的双重目标。尽管采取了多种措施,但这些干预措施的前提是,如果正确实施了自由化经济的市场激励措施,自然资源将得到最有效的管理和保护,同时有利于生计。通过研究越南的三个国家支持的生态系统服务付费计划,我们可以证明不安全的土地保有权,高交易成本和高机会成本如何破坏PES计划为当地家庭带来的长期利益,从而可能威胁他们的生计可行性。在许多情况下,由于政治和经济限制,从PES计划获得的收入没有达到穷人的水平。通过垄断获取林地和现有的国家林业管理,当地精英对PES收益的获取被认为是关键问题。我们认为,随着生态系统服务付费计划为生态系统服务创造市场,这些市场不仅应理解为“理性行为者”之间的秃顶经济交换,还应理解为包含在特定社会政治和历史背景下的交换,以支持森林资源的可持续利用。和越南当地的生计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号