首页> 外文期刊>Journal of engineering education >Professional Development, Departmental Contexts,and Use of Instructional Strategies
【24h】

Professional Development, Departmental Contexts,and Use of Instructional Strategies

机译:专业发展,部门背景和教学策略的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background A report from the American Society for Engineering Education (Jamieson & Lohmann, 2012) identified career-long professional development for faculty, teacher training in graduate programs, departmental climates that value and support educational innovation, and reward systems that recognize achievements in educational innovation as mechanisms to improve undergraduate engineering education. These factors have long been assumed to influence faculty members' choices to engage in educational improvements, but their relationships with teaching practices rarely have been studied. Purpose We examined the relationships among professional development, departmental contexts, and engineering faculty members' use of student-centered teaching practices. Design/Method This study drew on a nationally representative survey dataset of 906 engineering faculty members from 31 four-year institutions. We used multiple regression analyses to investigate whether graduate training, professional development, and institutional factors (e.g., reward systems) relate to engineering faculty members' use of student-centered teaching practices, such as active learning and frequent and detailed feedback to students. Results Professional development activities and, to a lesser extent, graduate training in teaching positively related to the use of student-centered teaching practices. We provide some of the first evidence that graduate training in teaching is linked to the use of student-centered teaching practices. Only modest relationships were observed between departmental environments and teaching practices. Conclusion Engineering departments seeking to increase the use of student-centered teaching practices should consider supporting faculty engagement in on- and off-campus professional development activities. Supporting these activities may be more effective than emphasizing research on engineering education and curriculum enhancement in reward decisions.
机译:背景信息美国工程教育学会的一份报告(Jamieson&Lohmann,2012年)确定了教师职业生涯的发展,研究生课程的教师培训,重视和支持教育创新的部门氛围以及奖励认可教育创新成就的系统作为改善本科工程教育的机制。长期以来,一直认为这些因素会影响教师选择进行教育改进的能力,但很少研究他们与教学实践的关系。目的我们研究了专业发展,部门环境和工程学系教职员工以学生为中心的教学实践之间的关系。设计/方法这项研究基于来自31个四年制机构的906名工程系教师的全国代表性调查数据集。我们使用多元回归分析来调查研究生的培训,专业发展和体制因素(例如奖励制度)是否与工程系教职员工以学生为中心的教学实践的使用有关,例如主动学习和对学生的频繁而详细的反馈。结果专业发展活动以及较少程度上的研究生教学培训与以学生为中心的教学实践的使用成正比。我们提供了一些最初的证据,表明研究生的教学培训与以学生为中心的教学实践的使用有关。在部门环境和教学实践之间仅观察到适度的关系。结论寻求增加使用以学生为中心的教学实践的工程部门应考虑支持教师参与校内和校外专业发展活动。支持这些活动可能比在奖励决策中强调工程教育和课程增强研究更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号