首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries >Discovery Tool vs. PubMed: A Health Sciences Literature Comparison Analysis
【24h】

Discovery Tool vs. PubMed: A Health Sciences Literature Comparison Analysis

机译:发现工具与PubMed:健康科学文献比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The East Carolina University libraries, though administratively separate, jointly subscribe to and collaborate on enhancements for a shared instance of the Summon Discovery Service. Based on usage, enhancements to the discovery tool over the past few years, and the perceived ease of searching in Summon, health sciences librarians have questioned whether Summon could now be considered a legitimate competitor to PubMed. This article includes results of a citation comparison between the two databases and the conclusion that Summon produces quality results, but should not be considered an adequate replacement information source for a subject-specific database like PubMed.
机译:东卡罗莱纳大学图书馆虽然在管理上是分开的,但它们共同订阅并协作以增强Summon Discovery Service共享实例的功能。根据使用情况,过去几年中发现工具的增强功能以​​及在Summon中易于搜索到的搜索结果,健康科学图书馆员质疑Summon是否现在可以被视为PubMed的合法竞争对手。本文包括两个数据库之间的引文比较结果,以及Summon产生高质量结果的结论,但不应将其视为特定主题数据库(如PubMed)的足够替代信息源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号