首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Educational Administration and History >Leadership: its genealogy, configuration and trajectory
【24h】

Leadership: its genealogy, configuration and trajectory

机译:领导力:家谱,结构和轨迹

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article provides a longitudinal analysis of leadership. In the first section of the article, the evidence reviewed indicates how, historically, leadership has been significant in various societal arrangements in the co‐ordination of actions for collective purposes. Such co‐ordination may also be facilitated through self‐organisation, except that this mechanism struggles in the face of genetic human pre‐dispositions to dominate, and the group‐level threshold effects of small numbers. The second section discusses the leadership field’s longstanding fixation with heroes. It shows how, in the face of the compelling evidence in the previous section of small group reverse dominance hierarchy and dyarchy, for example, the evidential basis for such heroic individualism is questionable. This second section also discusses distributed leadership. It argues for its abandonment and replacement as an analytical unit of analysis by the idea of leadership configurations comprising combinations of role sets. These claims are illustrated with historical and contemporary examples. The final section of the article argues for evidence‐based capabilities as an antidote to heroic leadership. Here, a range of problems and possibilities associated with identifying capabilities for leading learning are discussed along with some implications for future research and theory in the field.View full textDownload full textKeywordsleadership, configuration, co‐ordination, capability, holismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2010.492959
机译:本文对领导力进行了纵向分析。在本文的第一部分中,回顾的证据表明,从历史上看,领导在协调集体行动的各种社会安排中发挥了多么重要的作用。这种协调也可以通过自我组织得到促进,只是这种机制在面对遗传人的前趋于支配以及少数群体水平的阈值效应时会遇到困难。第二部分讨论领导领域对英雄的长期关注。例如,它表明,面对小团体反向支配等级制度和专制制度的令人信服的证据,这种英雄主义个人主义的证据基础是令人怀疑的。第二部分还将讨论分布式领导。它主张将领导角色配置(包括角色集的组合)作为分析的分析单元,从而将其放弃和替代。这些主张以历史和当代例子加以说明。本文的最后一部分主张以证据为基础的能力,作为英勇领导的解毒剂。这里讨论了与识别领导学习能力相关的一系列问题和可能性,以及对该领域未来研究和理论的一些启示。查看全文下载全文关键词领导力,配置,合作,能力,整体性相关var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2010.492959

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号