...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Psychology >'Facta non verba': An experiment on pledging and giving
【24h】

'Facta non verba': An experiment on pledging and giving

机译:“没有言语”:关于认捐和给予的实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We design an experiment to investigate whether asking people to state how much they will donate to a charity (i.e., to pledge) increases their actual donation. Individuals' endowment is either certain or a random variable. We study different types of pledges, namely, private, public and irrevocable, which differ in terms of the cost to the individual for not keeping the promise. We show that in absence of endowment uncertainty, private and public pledges are associated with lower donations as compared to donations in the no pledge case: private pledges slightly reduce donations and public pledges reduce them more significantly. Donations increase with uncertainty (in terms of increased endowment dispersion) for both private and public pledge situations, although donations with private pledges remain higher than donations with public pledge. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们设计了一个实验来调查是否要求人们说出他们将向慈善机构捐款多少(即认捐)会增加他们的实际捐款。个人的end赋是确定的还是随机的。我们研究了不同类型的承诺,即私人,公共和不可撤销的承诺,这些承诺在不遵守承诺的个人付出的代价方面有所不同。我们表明,在没有捐赠不确定性的情况下,与无抵押情况下的捐赠相比,私人和公共认捐与较低的捐赠相关:私人认捐稍微减少了捐赠,而公共认捐则大大减少了捐赠。私人和公共认捐情况下的捐款都随着不确定性(就捐赠in散的增加而言)而增加,尽管私人认捐的捐款仍然高于公共认捐的捐款。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号