首页> 外文期刊>The journal of economic perspectives >Law, Endowments and Property Rights
【24h】

Law, Endowments and Property Rights

机译:法律,End赋与财产权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Private property rights are crucial for personal welfare and economic development. Adam Smith (1776 [2000]) stressed that private contracting is a critical prerequisite for the voluntary, mutually beneficial exchanges that foster specialization, innovation and economic growth. Hayek (1960, p. 140) argued that protecting private property rights is vital for preventing coercion, securing liberty and enhancing personal welfare. More recently, a growing body of empirical work demonstrates a strong positive association between the degree to which countries protect private property and economic development (Knack and Keefer, 1995; Hall and Jones, 1999). The security of property rights, however, is not a natural occurrence; rather, it is an outcome of policy choices and social institutions. Any government strong enough to define and enforce property rights is also strong enough to abrogate those rights (North and Weingast, 1989). Thus, protection of property rights requires finding a balance between 1) an active government that enforces property rights, facilitates private contracting, and applies the law fairly to all; and 2) a government sufficiently constrained that it cannot engage in coercion and expropriation. Besides the explicit codes and formal enforcement organizations associated with defining, defending and interpreting private property rights and contracts, property rights are also shaped by the "moral and ethical" norms governing human interactions. Thus, in this paper, the term "property rights" refers to the degree to which a broad set of policies, legal and political systems, and informal norms define and protect private property, apply the law equally to all and limit government interference in private contracting.
机译:私有财产权对于个人福利和经济发展至关重要。亚当·斯密(Adam Smith,1776 [2000])强调,私人承包是促进专业化,创新和经济增长的自愿,互利的交流的关键前提。哈耶克(1960,p。140)认为,保护私有财产权对于防止强迫,确保自由和增进个人福祉至关重要。最近,越来越多的实证研究表明,国家保护私有财产的程度与经济发展之间存在着密切的正相关关系(Knack和Keefer,1995; Hall和Jones,1999)。但是,财产权的担保不是自然而然的事。相反,这是政策选择和社会制度的结果。任何足以定义和执行财产权的政府,也有足够的实力来废除这些权利(North and Weingast,1989)。因此,保护​​财产权需要在以下两者之间取得平衡:1)积极行使财产权,促进私人承包并公平地将法律适用于所有人的政府; 2)政府有足够的约束,使其不能进行胁迫和没收。除了与定义,捍卫和解释私有财产权和合同相关的明确的法规和正式的执法组织外,财产权还受到管理人类互动的“道德和伦理”规范的影响。因此,在本文中,“财产权”一词是指广泛的政策,法律和政治制度以及非正式规范定义和保护私有财产,将法律平等地应用于所有人并限制政府对私有财产的干预的程度。承包。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The journal of economic perspectives》 |2005年第3期|p.61-88|共28页
  • 作者

    Ross Levine;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 各科经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:25:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号