首页> 外文期刊>The journal of economic perspectives >A Pragmatic Approach to Capital Account Liberalization
【24h】

A Pragmatic Approach to Capital Account Liberalization

机译:资本账户自由化的务实方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the mid-1990s, mainstream economists of nearly all stripes commonly recommended capital account liberalization-that is, allowing a free flow of funds in and out of a country's economy-as an essential step in the process of economic development. Indeed, in September 1997, the governing body of the International Monetary Fund (1997) sought to make "the liberalization of capital movements one of the purposes of the IMF and extend, as needed, the IMF's jurisdiction . . . regarding the liberalization of such movements." But then came the East Asian financial crisis of 1997-98, in which even seemingly healthy and well-managed economies like those of South Korea were engulfed by massive capital outflows and tremendous currency volatility, and capital account liberalization became quite controversial in the economics profession. For example, Fischer (1998) and Summers (2000) continued to make the case for capital account liberalization, while Rodrik (1998) and Stiglitz (2000) were skeptical.
机译:在1990年代中期,几乎所有领域的主流经济学家通常都建议开放资本账户,即允许资金自由流入和流出一国的经济,这是经济发展过程中的重要步骤。实际上,1997年9月,国际货币基金组织理事机构(1997)力求使“资本流动的自由化成为国际货币基金组织的宗旨之一,并根据需要扩大国际货币基金组织的管辖权……动作。”但是随后是1997-98年的东亚金融危机,在该危机中,甚至看似健康和管理良好的经济体,例如韩国,也被大量的资本外流和巨大的货币波动所吞没,资本账户自由化在经济学界引起了很大争议。 。例如,Fischer(1998)和Summers(2000)继续为资本账户自由化辩护,而Rodrik(1998)和Stiglitz(2000)对此持怀疑态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号