首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >Do Hospitals React to Penalties? The Impact of Financial Penalties on Hospital Score Reporting Behavior
【24h】

Do Hospitals React to Penalties? The Impact of Financial Penalties on Hospital Score Reporting Behavior

机译:医院对罚款有反应吗?罚款对医院分数报告行为的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) created the Hospital Compare Program in 2003 to increase transparency between healthcare providers and consumers. Implemented in 2005, this transparency consists of hospitals' collecting and making publicly available a set of hospital quality score measures. The CMS induced participation by financially penalizing hospitals that did not publicly report a specific subset of these measures (called starter measures). Three years into the program, the penalty for non-reporting both the starter measures and other (non-starter) measures was increased. I use a difference-in-differences methodology to analyze the effect of the increased CMS penalty on the likelihood that a hospital publicly reported its starter and non-starter measure scores. I find that the penalty had an economically and statistically insignificant effect on the probability that a hospital publicly reported its starter scores, but a statistically significant 8.0 percent effect (p-value<0.01) on whether it reported its non-starter scores. These findings are robust to a series of alternative empirical specifications.
机译:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)于2003年创建了“医院比较计划”,以提高医疗服务提供者和消费者之间的透明度。这种透明性于2005年实施,包括医院收集并公开提供一套医院质量评分指标。 CMS通过对未公开报告这些措施的特定子集(称为启动措施)的医院进行财务处罚来诱导其参与。计划实施三年后,加大了对未报告启动措施和其他(非启动)措施的处罚。我使用差异差异方法来分析CMS罚款增加对医院公开报告其起始值和非起始值得分的可能性的影响。我发现处罚对医院公开报告其起始评分的可能性在经济和统计上均无影响,但对是否报告其非起始评分具有统计学意义的8.0%的影响(p值<0.01)。这些发现对于一系列替代性的经验指标是可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号