首页> 外文期刊>Journal of design history >The Question of Agency in the Understanding of Design
【24h】

The Question of Agency in the Understanding of Design

机译:设计理解中的代理人问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Something has happened recently on the way to design understanding. When 'design studies' emerged in its contemporary form in the late 1970s and 1980s it was axiomatic that at least one of its pillars, and by no means the least, was history. This was taken for granted, for example, in the founding principles of the journal Design Issues, and in this the journal followed not only the existing academic strengths in design history as then was (a history that at best, pedagogically, was still linked to practice, as evident in some of the early publications of the Design History Society), but also earlier, seemingly more technical, studies of design methods.
机译:最近在进行设计理解的过程中发生了一些事情。当“设计研究”以现代形式出现在1970年代末期和1980年代时,它是理所当然的,它的至少一个支柱,至少绝不是历史。例如,这在《 Design Issues》杂志的创立原则中被认为是理所当然的,并且在该期刊中,它不仅遵循了当时的设计史上的现有学术优势(这一历史充其量在教学上仍与实践,这在《设计史学会》的一些早期出版物中是很明显的,但在更早期的,似乎是技术性更强的设计方法方面也是如此。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of design history》 |2013年第3期|331-337|共7页
  • 作者

    Clive Dilnot;

  • 作者单位

    Parsons The New School for Design, School of Art Design History Theory, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:57:14

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号