首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contemporary European studies >A Comparative Approach to Euroscepticism in Turkey and Eastern European Countries
【24h】

A Comparative Approach to Euroscepticism in Turkey and Eastern European Countries

机译:土耳其和东欧国家对欧洲怀疑论的比较方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The pre-accession strategy, by challenging national sovereignty, erodes motivations for EU membership in the candidate countries, hence arising nationalistic reactions. Euroscepticism manifests itself in various forms depending on the way the country undergoes the transition, the domestic meaning of the accession and the country-specific patterns of euroscepticism. The Central and Eastern European countries mostly display great motivations for accession. The gap between expectations and the EU's functioning feed public euroscepticism. Mainstream party consensus however, often filters euroscepticism. Turkey distinguishes by an overall mistrust at both public and party level. The EU's reform demands and the European reluctance for Turkish accession have generated mistrust, focusing the 'EU debate' on the cost of accession. At public level, mistrust has fed the idea of an 'EU threat' around which the different spheres of the society have come together to oppose EU membership. At party level, mistrust caused parties from fully embracing the EU prospective, which the 2002 elections exemplify. The Turkish case thus illustrates how the uncertainty of the accession affects public opinion and party positioning on the EU issue.
机译:加入前的战略通过挑战国家主权,侵蚀了欧盟加入候选国的动机,因此引起了民族主义的反应。欧洲怀疑论以各种形式表现出来,这取决于该国经历的转型方式,加入的国内含义以及特定国家的欧洲怀疑论模式。中东欧国家大多表现出加入的巨大动机。期望值与欧盟正在发挥作用之间的差距引发了公众对欧元的怀疑。然而,主流政党的共识经常过滤掉欧洲的怀疑态度。土耳其在公众和政党层面的总体不信任都与众不同。欧盟的改革要求和欧洲对土耳其加入的不愿产生了不信任感,将“欧盟辩论”的重点放在了加入成本上。在公共层面,不信任感已经引发了“欧盟威胁”的构想,社会的各个领域都围绕着这一点团结起来,反对加入欧盟。在政党层面,不信任感使政党无法完全接受欧盟的预期,2002年的选举就是例证。因此,土耳其案件说明了加入的不确定性如何影响公众舆论和有关欧盟问题的政党立场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号