首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contemporary African Studies >Narratives of progress: Zimbabwean historiography and the end of history
【24h】

Narratives of progress: Zimbabwean historiography and the end of history

机译:进展的叙述:津巴布韦的历史学和历史的终结

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This brief commentary takes its inspiration from the opening address delivered by John Hoffman, and printed in these pages; that is, progress is usefully understood as a contradictory, contested and ambiguous process. But rather than attempt a comprehensive survey of the past 40 or so years of academic analyses of Zimbabwe's pasts, what follows has as its focus the emergence of ‘patriotic history’ and particularly its nationalist antecedents. These are critically examined. Although not concerned with the generality of recent studies that are neither nationalist nor materialist in orientation, this paper sketches in outline the rise, fall and rise of radical accounts. It ends by suggesting how such analyses might be taken forward.View full textDownload full textKeywordsZimbabwe, historiography, patriotic history, nationalism, political economy, MatabelelandRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2012.639657
机译:这篇简短的评论源于约翰·霍夫曼(John Hoffman)致开幕词的启发,并已印在这些页面上。也就是说,进步被有效地理解为一个矛盾,有争议和模棱两可的过程。但是,与其尝试对津巴布韦过去40多年的学术分析进行全面调查,不如以下是其重点是“爱国历史”的出现,尤其是民族主义的前身。这些都经过严格检查。尽管不关心既不是民族主义的也不是唯物主义的近期研究的普遍性,但本文概述了激进主义理论的兴衰,兴衰和兴起。文章最后以建议如何进行此类分析为结尾。 ,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2012.639657

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号