...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consumer policy >Price Intransparency, Consumer Decision Making and European Consumer Law
【24h】

Price Intransparency, Consumer Decision Making and European Consumer Law

机译:价格不透明,消费者决策和欧洲消费者法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Price comparison is a basic element of competition. For comparison to work, at least prices need to be transparent. Moreover, price is usually a focal point in consumer thinking and deciding on transactions. Hence, obfuscating prices can be detrimental to consumers. Therefore, it is vital for policymakers to know how transparent pricing is in reality. Commercial practices involving price intransparency can be detrimental to consumer decision making and may be associated with market failure. So, legislative intervention to ensure price transparency is sometimes warranted. Suppliers may disclose and frame pricing information in such ways as to influence consumers. For some suppliers, advantages may be gained by obfuscating price— through practices ranging from the outright hiding of price terms in the small print to subtle ways of throwing in gifts or adding charges during the vending process. Do consumers appreciate the implications of the fact that by framing price in different ways suppliers actually try to influence their demand for products? And how does the law broadly speaking respond to problems of price intransparency? In this article, behavioural science insights are combined with a legal analysis of European consumer law in order to chart some of the detrimental influences of price intransparency on the consumer decision-making process and to answer whether and to what extent European consumer law addresses these issues. In doing so, this article first reviews research from consumer psychology, marketing, and behavioural law, and economics regarding the influence of presentation, framing, and transparency of price on the consumer decision-making process. Subsequently, it describes and evaluates the legal framework offered by European consumer law and how this framework responds to practices of price intransparency. Particular problematic pricing techniques are identified and discussed. In conclusion, attention is drawn to the disadvantages of the increasing full harmonization character of European consumer law for combating price intransparency at Member State level.
机译:价格比较是竞争的基本要素。为了进行比较,至少价格需要透明。此外,价格通常是消费者思考和决定交易的重点。因此,混淆价格可能对消费者有害。因此,决策者必须了解现实中的定价透明性,这一点至关重要。涉及价格不透明的商业惯例可能会损害消费者的决策,并可能导致市场失灵。因此,有时必须采取立法干预以确保价格透明。供应商可以以影响消费者的方式披露和制定价格信息。对于某些供应商而言,通过使价格模糊不清可能会获得优势,其方式包括从在小字中完全隐藏价格条款到在自动售货过程中投放礼品或增加费用的微妙方式。消费者是否理解以下事实的含义:通过以不同方式确定价格,供应商实际上试图影响其对产品的需求?从广义上讲,法律如何应对价格不透明的问题?在本文中,将行为科学的见解与对欧洲消费者法的法律分析相结合,以绘制价格不透明对消费者决策过程的一些不利影响,并回答欧洲消费者法是否以及在何种程度上解决了这些问题。在此过程中,本文首先回顾了来自消费者心理学,市场营销和行为法以及经济学的研究,这些研究涉及价格的呈现,框架和透明度对消费者决策过程的影响。随后,它描述并评估了欧洲消费者法提供的法律框架,以及该框架如何应对价格不透明的做法。确定并讨论了特定的有问题的定价技术。总之,提请注意欧洲消费者法在反对成员国一级价格不透明方面日益增强的全面统一性的弊端。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号