首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computing in Higher Education >Online versus paper evaluations: differences in both quantitative and qualitative data
【24h】

Online versus paper evaluations: differences in both quantitative and qualitative data

机译:在线评估与纸质评估:定量和定性数据的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study sought to determine if differences exist in the quantitative and qualitative data collected with paper and online versions of a medical school clerkship evaluation form. Data from six-and-a-half years of clerkship evaluations were used, some collected before and some after the conversion from a paper to an online evaluation system. The quantitative data consisted of a composite score based on the average of several Likert-type items; the qualitative data consisted of open-ended comments about the clerkships. Clerkship ratings were more positive in the online version. Students made significantly longer comments about both strengths and weaknesses on the online form than on the paper form. In addition, comments made on the online form were judged to be more informative and showed less evidence of “negativity” than those made on the paper form. The findings suggest that both quantitative and qualitative data obtained with online evaluation forms can differ in important ways from data collected with paper forms.
机译:这项研究试图确定用纸质和在线版本的医学院校职员评估表收集的定量和定性数据是否存在差异。使用了六年半的文职评估的数据,其中一些是在从论文转换为在线评估系统之前和之后收集的。定量数据由基于几个李克特型项目的平均值的综合评分组成。定性数据由有关业务的不限成员名额评论组成。在线版本的文员等级更为正面。与纸质表格相比,学生对在线表格的优缺点的评论要长得多。此外,与纸质表格相比,在线表格上的评论被认为具有更多的信息性,并且显示出“消极”的证据更少。研究结果表明,在线评估表获得的定量和定性数据可能与纸质表单收集的数据在重要方面有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号