...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer and system sciences >Independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies
【24h】

Independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies

机译:通过展平进行经典求反的独立友好逻辑是具有弱依赖关系的二阶逻辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is well-known that Independence Friendly (IF) logic is equivalent to existential second-order logic (∑_1~1) and, therefore, is not closed under classical negation. The Boolean closure of IF sentences, called Extended IF-logic, on the other hand, corresponds to a proper fragment of Δ1/2. In this article we consider SL(↓), IF-logic extended with Hodges' flattening operator ↓, which allows to define a classical negation. SL(↓) contains Extended IF-logic and hence it is at least as expressive as the Boolean closure of ∑_1~1. We prove that SL(↓) corresponds to a weak syntactic fragment of SO which we show to be strictly contained in Δ1/2. The separation is derived almost trivially from the fact that ∑_n~1 defines its own truth-predicate. We finally show that SL(↓) is equivalent to the logic of Henkin quantifiers, which shows, we argue, that Hodges' notion of negation is adequate.
机译:众所周知,独立友好(IF)逻辑等效于存在的二阶逻辑(∑_1〜1),因此在经典否定下不会关闭。另一方面,称为扩展IF逻辑的IF语句的布尔闭包对应于Δ1/ 2的适当片段。在本文中,我们考虑使用Hodges的展平运算符↓扩展的IF逻辑SL(↓),它可以定义经典的求反。 SL(↓)包含扩展的IF逻辑,因此它的表达至少与∑_1〜1的布尔闭包相同。我们证明SL(↓)对应于SO的一个弱语法片段,我们证明严格将其包含在Δ1/ 2中。分离几乎是从∑_n〜1定义了自己的真谓词这一事实得出的。最终,我们证明SL(↓)等同于Henkin量词的逻辑,这证明了霍奇斯的否定概念是足够的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号