首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer security >Verifying privacy-type properties of electronic voting protocols
【24h】

Verifying privacy-type properties of electronic voting protocols

机译:验证电子投票协议的隐私类型属性

获取原文

摘要

Electronic voting promises the possibility of a convenient, efficient and secure facility for recording and tallying votes in an election. Recently highlighted inadequacies of implemented systems have demonstrated the importance of formally verifying the underlying voting protocols. We study three privacy-type properties of electronic voting protocols: in increasing order of strength, they are vote-privacy, receipt-freeness and coercion-resistance.rnWe use the applied pi calculus, a formalism well adapted to modelling such protocols, which has the advantages of being based on well-understood concepts. The privacy-type properties are expressed using observational equivalence and we show in accordance with intuition that coercion-resistance implies receipt-freeness, which implies vote-privacy.rnWe illustrate our definitions on three electronic voting protocols from the literature. Ideally, these three properties should hold even if the election officials are corrupt. However, protocols that were designed to satisfy receipt-freeness or coercion-resistance may not do so in the presence of corrupt officials. Our model and definitions allow us to specify and easily change which authorities are supposed to be trustworthy.
机译:电子投票有望为选举中的记录和记票提供便利,高效和安全的设施。最近强调的已实施系统的不足之处已经证明了正式验证基础投票协议的重要性。我们研究了电子投票协议的三种隐私类型属性:按强度递增的顺序依次为:投票隐私,无收据和抗胁迫。rn我们使用了实用的演算方法,一种非常适合于对此类协议进行建模的形式主义,基于易于理解的概念的优势。隐私类型的属性使用观察等价来表示,并且根据直觉,我们表明,抗胁迫性意味着无收据,这意味着有投票权。rn我们从文献中阐明了我们对三种电子投票协议的定义。理想情况下,即使选举官员腐败,这三个属性也应保留。但是,在腐败官员在场的情况下,旨在满足无收据或抗胁迫性的协议可能不会这样做。我们的模型和定义使我们能够指定并轻松更改哪些权威机构值得信赖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号