首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computational Physics >THE METHOD OF SPACE-TIME CONSERVATION ELEMENT AND SOLUTION ELEMENT - A NEW APPROACH FOR SOLVING THE NAVIER-STOKES AND EULER EQUATIONS
【24h】

THE METHOD OF SPACE-TIME CONSERVATION ELEMENT AND SOLUTION ELEMENT - A NEW APPROACH FOR SOLVING THE NAVIER-STOKES AND EULER EQUATIONS

机译:时空保留元素和解决方案元素的方法-一种求解Navoke-Stokes和Euler方程的新方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A new numerical framework for solving conservation laws is being developed. This new framework differs substantially in both concept and methodology from the well-established methods, i.e., finite difference, finite volume, finite element, and spectral methods. It is conceptually simple and designed to overcome several key limitations of the above traditional methods. A two-level scheme for solving the convection-diffusion equation partial derivative u/partial derivative t + a partial derivative u/partial derivative x - mu partial derivative(2)u/partial derivative x(2) = 0 (mu greater than or equal to 0) is constructed and used to illuminate major differences between the present method and those mentioned above. This explicit scheme, referred to as the a-mu, scheme, has two independent marching variables u eta and (u(x))eta which are the numerical analogues of u and partial derivative u/partial derivative x at (j, n), respectively. The a-mu scheme has the unusual property that its stability is limited only by the CFL condition, i.e., it is independent of mu. Also it ca n be shown that the amplification factors of the a-mu scheme are identical to those of the Leapfrog scheme if mu = 0, and to those of the DuFort-Frankel scheme if a = 0. These coincidences are unexpected because the a-mu scheme and the above classical schemes are derived from completely different perspectives, and the a-mu scheme does not reduce to the above classical schemes in the limiting cases. The a-mu scheme is extended to solve the 1D time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations of a perfect gas. Stability of this explicit solver also is limited only by the CFL condition. In spite of the fact that it does not use (i) any techniques related to the high-resolution upwind methods, and (ii) any ad hoc parameter, the current Navier-Stokes solver is capable of generating highly accurate shock tube solutions. Particularly, for high-Reynolds-number flows, shock discontinuities can be resolved within one mesh interval. The inviscid (mu = O) a-mu scheme is reversible in time. It also is neutrally stable, i.e., free from numerical dissipation. Such a scheme generally cannot be extended to solve the Euler equations. Thus, the inviscid version is modified. Stability of this modified scheme, referred to as the a-E scheme, is limited by the CFL condition and 0 less than or equal to epsilon less than or equal to 1, where epsilon is a special parameter that controls numerical dissipation. Moreover, if epsilon = 0, the amplification factors of the a-epsilon scheme are identical to those of the Leapfrog scheme, which has no numerical dissipation. On the other hand, if epsilon = 1, the two amplification factors of the a-epsilon scheme become the same function of the Courant number and the phase angle. Unexpectedly, this function also is the amplification factor of the highly diffusive Lax scheme. Note that, because the Lax scheme is very diffusive and it uses a mesh that is staggered in time, a two-level scheme using such a mesh is often associated with a highly diffusive scheme. The a-epsilon scheme, which also uses a mesh staggering in time, demonstrates that it can also be a scheme with no numerical dissipation. The Euler extension of the a-epsilon scheme has stability conditions similar to those of the a-epsilon scheme itself. It has the unusual property that numerical dissipation at all mesh points can be controlled by a set of local parameters. Moreover, it is capable of generating accurate shock tube solutions with the CFL number ranging from close to 1 to 0.022 (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc. [References: 31]
机译:正在开发一种用于解决保护法则的新数值框架。这个新框架在概念和方法上都与公认的方法有很大的不同,即有限差分,有限体积,有限元和频谱方法。它在概念上很简单,旨在克服上述传统方法的几个关键限制。求解对流扩散方程的两级方案偏导数u /偏导数t +偏导数u /偏导数x-mu偏导数(2)u /偏导数x(2)= 0(μ大于或构造等于0)并用于阐明本方法与上述方法之间的主要差异。此显式方案称为a-mu,方案,具有两个独立的行进变量u eta和(u(x))eta,它们是u和(j,n)处的偏导数u /偏导数x的数值类似物, 分别。 a-mu方案具有不寻常的特性,即其稳定性仅受CFL条件限制,即,它独立于mu。还可以看出,如果mu = 0,则a-mu方案的放大因子与Leapfrog方案的放大因子相同;如果a = 0,则其与DuFort-Frankel方案的放大因子相同。这些巧合是意外的,因为a -mu方案和上述经典方案是从完全不同的角度得出的,并且在有限的情况下,a-mu方案不会减少到上述经典方案。扩展了a-mu方案,以求解理想气体的一维时间相关Navier-Stokes方程。该显式求解器的稳定性也仅受CFL条件限制。尽管它不使用(i)与高分辨率迎风方法有关的任何技术,以及(ii)任何临时参数,但当前的Navier-Stokes解算器能够生成高精度的激波管解决方案。特别是,对于高雷诺数流,可以在一个网格间隔内解决冲击不连续性。无粘性(mu = O)a-mu方案在时间上是可逆的。它也是中性稳定的,即没有数值耗散。这种方案通常不能扩展为求解欧拉方程。因此,修改了无痕版本。这种修改后的方案(称为a-E方案)的稳定性受到CFL条件的限制,并且0小于或等于epsilon小于或等于1,其中epsilon是控制数值耗散的特殊参数。而且,如果ε= 0,则α-ε方案的扩增因子与没有数值耗散的Leapfrog方案的那些相同。另一方面,如果ε= 1,则aε方案的两个放大因子成为库仑数和相角的函数。出乎意料的是,此功能也是高扩散Lax方案的放大因子。请注意,由于Lax方案的扩散性很强,并且它使用的网格时间交错,因此使用这种网格的两级方案通常与高度扩散的方案相关联。 a-ε方案也使用时间上交错的网格,这表明它也可以是没有数值耗散的方案。 aε方案的Euler扩展具有类似于aε方案本身的稳定性条件。它具有不寻常的特性,即可以通过一组局部参数来控制所有网格点的数值耗散。此外,它还能够生成CFL值范围从接近1到0.022(C)的准确的激波管解决方案(C)1995 Academic Press,Inc. [参考:31]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号