首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience >Early and Late Electrophysiological Effects of Distractor Frequency in Picture Naming: Reconciling Input and Output Accounts
【24h】

Early and Late Electrophysiological Effects of Distractor Frequency in Picture Naming: Reconciling Input and Output Accounts

机译:图像命名中干扰频率的早期和后期电生理效应:协调输入和输出帐户

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The “distractor-frequency effect” refers to the finding that high-frequency (HF) distractor words slow picture naming less than low-frequency distractors in the picture–word interference paradigm. Rival input and output accounts of this effect have been proposed. The former attributes the effect to attentional selection mechanisms operating during distractor recognition, whereas the latter attributes it to monitoring/decision mechanisms operating on distractor and target responses in an articulatory buffer. Using high-density (128-channel) EEG, we tested hypotheses from these rival accounts. In addition to conducting stimulus- and response-locked whole-brain corrected analyses, we investigated the correct-related negativity, an ERP observed on correct trials at fronto-central electrodes proposed to reflect the involvement of domain general monitoring. The whole-brain ERP analysis revealed a significant effect of distractor frequency at inferior right frontal and temporal sites between 100 and 300-msec post-stimulus onset, during which lexical access is thought to occur. Response-locked, region of interest (ROI) analyses of fronto-central electrodes revealed a correct-related negativity starting 121 msec before and peaking 125 msec after vocal onset on the grand averages. Slope analysis of this component revealed a significant difference between HF and low-frequency distractor words, with the former associated with a steeper slope on the time window spanning from 100 msec before to 100 msec after vocal onset. The finding of ERP effects in time windows and components corresponding to both lexical processing and monitoring suggests the distractor frequency effect is most likely associated with more than one physiological mechanism.
机译:“干扰频率效应”指的是,在词-词干扰范例中,高频(HF)干扰词在图片命名方面比低频干扰要慢。已经提出了这种效果的竞争性输入和输出帐户。前者将这种效应归因于干扰物识别过程中的注意力选择机制,而后者则将其归因于对干扰物的监视/决策机制和关节运动缓冲器中的目标反应。使用高密度(128通道)EEG,我们测试了来自这些竞争对手帐户的假设。除了进行刺激和响应锁​​定的全脑校正分析外,我们还研究了校正相关的阴性,在额中央电极的正确试验中观察到的ERP提出以反映领域一般监测的参与。全脑ERP分析显示,在刺激发生后100毫秒至300毫秒之间,右下额叶和颞下位点的牵张器频率有显着影响,在此期间可能发生词汇访问。额中央电极的响应锁定的感兴趣区域(ROI)分析显示,在总体平均值上,人声发作之前121毫秒之前开始并在峰值125毫秒之后达到了正确相关的负电性。对该分量的斜率分析表明,高频干扰词和低频干扰词之间存在显着差异,前者与时间窗上较陡的斜率相关,其范围从发声前的100毫秒到发声后的100毫秒。在时间窗口和与词汇处理和监控相对应的组件中发现ERP效果表明,干扰频率的效果最有可能与一种以上的生理机制有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号