首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Corporate social responsibility definitions in supply chain research: An ontological analysis
【24h】

Corporate social responsibility definitions in supply chain research: An ontological analysis

机译:供应链研究中的企业社会责任定义:本体论分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this article is to propose an ontological framework of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and to investigate CSR definitions published in supply chain research in reference to the proposed ontological framework. The dimensions of the CSR ontological framework are clustered into five broad categories: approach, benefits, stakeholders, temporality, and action. Through the systematic literature review, a total of 96 definitions from the supply chain research are identified. The chosen definitions are analysed word-to-word and presented as an ontological map of monads and dyads. Further, a mapping software tool Ucinet is used to visualise the network structure of the dimensions and categories of the CSR definitions. The analysis at the monad level demonstrates that secondary and primary stakeholder and social benefits are the most frequently referred dimensions. The dyadic-level analysis highlights that socialeeconomic benefits and primaryesecondary stakeholder dimensions co-occurred heavily resulting in bright spots. Centrality measures of the network analysis indicate that there are major differences in how researchers used dimensions/categories while defining CSR in the context of supply chain research. This article is the first attempt to develop a logically constructed natural-language description of CSR in an ontological framework. The proposed framework will help practitioners to develop coherent and congruent CSR knowledge and conceptualise CSR that is suitable to their context and effectively communicate with the employees and external stakeholders. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文的目的是提出企业社会责任(CSR)的本体论框架,并调查在供应链研究中发表的CSR定义,参考拟议的本体论框架。 CSR本体本体框架的尺寸被聚集成五类:方法,福利,利益相关者,暂时性和行动。通过系统文献综述,确定了来自供应链研究的96个定义。选择的定义被分析了单词,并作为MONADS和DYADS的本体地图呈现。此外,映射软件工具UCInet用于可视化CSR定义的维度和类别的网络结构。 Monad水平的分析表明,中学和主要利益相关者和社会效益是最常见的尺寸。二元分析突出了社会经济益处和主要的利益相关者尺寸同事严重导致明亮的斑点。网络分析的集中度量表明,研究人员如何在供应链研究中定义CSR时如何使用尺寸/类别存在重大差异。本文首次尝试在本体论框架中开发CSR的逻辑构建的自然语言描述。拟议的框架将有助于从业人员开发合适的CSR知识和概念性的CSR,这适合其背景,并有效地与员工和外部利益相关者沟通。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号