首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Comparative LCA of recycled and natural aggregate concrete using Particle Packing Method and conventional method of design mix
【24h】

Comparative LCA of recycled and natural aggregate concrete using Particle Packing Method and conventional method of design mix

机译:使用颗粒包装法和常规设计混合方法对比较LCA和自然骨料混凝土的比较LCA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In construction industry, apart from cement, the aggregate type, mix design method and transport distance of raw materials also contribute significantly to the environment related issues. This paper compares environment impacts of recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) and Particle Packing Method (PPM) of mix design approach with the concrete proportioned using natural coarse aggregate (NCA) and IS code method. The system boundary is determined based on cradle-to-gate theory. The primary data regarding the preparation of NCA and RCA are collected from the respective production facilities and Ecoinvent 3.01 is used as background database. Abiotic depletion, abiotic depletion due to fossil fuels, global warming potential, depletion of ozone layer, formation of tropospheric ozone photochemical oxidants, acidification potential, and eutrophication potential are measured using CML baseline method with the help of SimaPro software. Lower environmental impacts are observed for PPM mix designed concrete owing to the requirement of lesser cement quantity. The combination of RCA and PPM mix design approach exhibits minimum environmental impacts. Transport activities are the second largest contributor after cement and hence, sensitivity analysis is carried out to evaluate the influence of different transport scenarios and distances in Indian context. For comparable environmental impact with natural aggregate concrete proportioned using IS code method, the maximum possible supply distance of RCA is determined for different collection distance of C&D waste. The collection distance of C&D waste can be incremented by 9-12 km for each 50 km increment in the supply distance of processed RCA to prepare recycled aggregate concrete. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在建筑业,除了水泥,骨料类型,混合设计方法和原材料的运输距离也有显着贡献环境相关问题。本文比较了循环粗骨料(RCA)和颗粒填充方法(PPM)与使用天然粗骨料(NCA)比例的混合设计方法的环境影响,是代码方法。基于托架到栅极理论确定系统边界。关于编写NCA和RCA的主要数据从相应的生产设施中收集,并将EcoInvent 3.01用作背景数据库。非生物耗尽,非化石燃料引起的非生物耗尽,全球变暖势,臭氧层耗尽,采用CML基线方法在司马波软件的帮助下使用CML基线测量氧化氧化剂,酸化潜力和富营养化潜力。由于水泥量的要求,PPM混合设计混凝土观察到较低的环境影响。 RCA和PPM混合设计方法的组合表现出最小的环境影响。运输活动是水泥之后的第二大贡献者,并进行了敏感性分析,以评估印度语境中不同传输情景和距离的影响。对于使用IS COD方法的自然聚集体混凝土的可比环境影响,RCA的最大可能供应距离是C&D废物的不同收集距离。 C&D浪费的收集距离可以递增9-12 km,每个50 km增加加工RCA的供电距离,以准备再循环骨料混凝土。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号