首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Comparison of carbon balance measuring tools in an enhanced oil recovery project based on the carbon dioxide from the ammonia production process streams
【24h】

Comparison of carbon balance measuring tools in an enhanced oil recovery project based on the carbon dioxide from the ammonia production process streams

机译:基于氨生产工艺流中的二氧化碳的强化采油项目中碳平衡测量工具的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A number of studies addressing the environmental impact of deploying carbon capture utilization and storage are focused on sources of CO2 in the power sector. However, there is a lack of environmental studies on the use of CO2 from process stream within the oil and gas industries. The carbon balance of an enhanced oil recovery project for the specific case of using CO2 process stream of ammonia production from emission factors and regional databases in the Mexican oil and gas sector was assessed. Two independent tools to assess life cycle assessment according to guidelines ISO 14040/14044 were utilized: (i) use of Umberto software to quantify the environmental impact with ReCiPe model midpoint; and, (ii) The American Petroleum Institute method through the use of emissions factor for each source and emission gas of the activity/facility in a spread sheet. The results of the tools were compared and the dissimilarities analysed. The emissions profiles from all direct and indirect activities associated with the enhanced oil recovery system were compared with a "cradle-to-grave" model. The functional unit is one barrel of crude oil extracted and consumed. Global warming as the environmental indicator of both tools was used. Additionally, the energy balance of the project was estimated. The global warming impact of the enhanced oil recovery system was 0.51 tCO(2e)/barrel (bbl) using the American Petroleum Institute tool, whilst the emissions using Umberto software were 0.54 tCO(2e)/bbl. Also, for each MJ of energy produced a value of 72 tCO(2e)/MJ oil and of 66 tCO(2e)/MJ oil, were obtained. This study demonstrates that both tools delivered an accurate estimation of the greenhouse gas emissions in the enhanced oil recovery system for the oil and gas industries. However, American Petroleum Institute has the advantage that the calculations can be performed Manually' in a spread sheet using emissions factor adjusted to the facilities and Country. Regarding the results of both tools, this work shows that American Petroleum Institute results have proven to be an efficient tool for practitioners and researchers that intend to analyse the greenhouse gas emission of carbon capture utilization and storage systems to estimate, with accuracy, the global warming impact. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:针对碳捕集利用和封存部署对环境的影响的许多研究都集中在电力部门的二氧化碳排放源上。然而,在石油和天然气行业中,缺乏有关使用过程物流中的二氧化碳的环境研究。在墨西哥石油和天然气行业,针对排放因子和区域数据库中使用氨生产的CO2工艺流产生的特定案例,评估了强化采油项目的碳平衡。根据ISO 14040/14044准则,使用了两个独立的工具来评估生命周期评估:(i)使用Umberto软件量化ReCiPe模型中点对环境的影响; (ii)通过使用电子表格中活动/设施的每种来源和排放气体的排放因子来使用美国石油协会的方法。比较了工具的结果并分析了差异。将与强化采油系统相关的所有直接和间接活动的排放曲线与“从摇篮到坟墓”模型进行了比较。功能单位是一桶提取和消耗的原油。使用全球变暖作为这两种工具的环境指标。此外,还估算了项目的能源平衡。使用美国石油协会的工具,强化采油系统对全球变暖的影响为0.51 tCO(2e)/桶(bbl),而使用Umberto软件的排放量为0.54 tCO(2e)/桶。同样,对于产生的每MJ能量,获得的值为72 tCO(2e)/ MJ油,为66 tCO(2e)/ MJ油。这项研究表明,这两种工具都能为石油和天然气行业的增强型采油系统准确估算出温室气体的排放量。但是,美国石油协会(American Petroleum Institute)的优势在于,可以使用针对设施和国家/地区进行调整的排放因子,在电子表格中手动进行计算。关于这两种工具的结果,这项工作表明,美国石油学会的结果已被证明是对打算分析碳捕获利用和储存系统的温室气体排放量以准确估算全球变暖的从业者和研究人员的有效工具。影响。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号