首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of different wheat production systems
【24h】

Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of different wheat production systems

机译:生命周期评估以比较不同小麦生产系统的环境影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The share of fossil-based resources in the implementation of agricultural activities in Iran is very high. In this context, it is important to determine the environmental impacts of energy use in agricultural activities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the energy consumption and total environmental impacts of irrigated and rainfed wheat production in central Iran, Mahyar plain. For this purpose, data were collected from 120 irrigated and 90 rainfed wheat farms in three different farm size (2 ha, 2-4 ha and more than 4 ha), through questionnaires and site visits. In this study, standard ISO life cycle assessment methodology was used to evaluate the total impact of all consuming inputs on environmental pollution and show the main hotspot in the production chain. Results of energy analyses showed that large farms used more energy per unit of farm land than that of small farms. Farmers also used higher input energy for irrigated wheat in comparison with rainfed system. The overall energy use efficiency for per unit farm of irrigated wheat production was only half of rainfed wheat production. Results of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) models show that rainfed wheat actually produced more pollution than irrigated wheat production because of lower yield in ha. In this study, the rate of Abiotic Depletion (AD) and Acidification (AC) impact were 0.002-0.003 kg Sb eq and 8.991-11.863 kg SO2 eq for wheat production (irrigated and reainfed), respectively. Also the Ozone Layer Depletion (OLD) and Photochemical Oxidation (PO) were calculated 0.00002-0.00004 kg CFC11 eq and 0.145-0.174 kg C2H4 eq for wheat production (irrigated and reainfed), respectively. The results showed that the main hotspots for irrigated and rainfed wheat production were chemical fertilizers and diesel fuel. Based on the results, it is suggested to use more intensive cropping systems (such as solar greenhouse) to decrease the intensity of input energy and increase the output level of productions with minimum environmental pollution. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:化石资源在伊朗开展农业活动中所占的比例很高。在这种情况下,确定农业活动中能源使用对环境的影响很重要。这项研究的目的是评估和比较伊朗中部Mahyar平原的灌溉和雨养小麦生产的能源消耗和总环境影响。为此,通过问卷调查和实地考察,从三个不同农场规模(<2公顷,2-4公顷和超过4公顷)的120个灌溉小麦农场和90个雨养小麦农场收集了数据。在这项研究中,使用标准ISO生命周期评估方法来评估所有消耗性投入对环境污染的总体影响,并显示生产链中的主要热点。能源分析结果表明,大型农场每单位耕地的能源消耗要比小型农场多。与雨养系统相比,农民还使用了更高的灌溉小麦输入能量。灌溉小麦生产的每个农场的整体能源利用效率仅为雨养小麦生产的一半。生命周期评估(LCA)模型的结果表明,雨养小麦实际上比灌溉小麦生产产生更多的污染,这是因为ha的产量较低。在这项研究中,小麦生产(灌溉和再灌溉)的非生物耗竭(AD)和酸化(AC)速率分别为0.002-0.003 kg Sb eq和8.991-11.863 kg SO2 eq。还计算出小麦生产(灌溉和再灌溉)的臭氧层消耗量(OLD)和光化学氧化(PO)分别为0.00002-0.00004 kg CFC11当量和0.145-0.174 kg C2H4当量。结果表明,灌溉和雨养小麦生产的主要热点是化肥和柴油。根据结果​​,建议使用更集约化的耕作系统(例如日光温室),以减少投入能源的强度并提高生产的产出水平,同时将环境污染降至最低。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号