首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Comparative study of city-level sustainability assessment standards in China and the United States
【24h】

Comparative study of city-level sustainability assessment standards in China and the United States

机译:中美城市可持续发展评估标准的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In analyses of urban environments, city-level sustainability assessments standards have received a lot of attention. Many countries, particularly in the developed world, have developed the standards to measure the performance of neighborhoods, districts, and cities in achieving sustainable development goals. In this study, four standards from China and the United States were selected and analyzed within the scope of green and sustainable development. China's new Assessment Standard for Green Eco-districts (ASGE) targets to support China's New-type Urbanization Plan from the conceptual stage to the concrete implementation. LEED (R) rating systems are one of the important references for the development of ASGE. By comparing ASGE with the advanced standards it draws from, this study aimed to evaluate ASGE's work in adapting to China's national conditions; pointing out the strengths and weaknesses and proposing improvements. The study results indicate that the rating systems of ASGE are in line with China's national conditions, and that some non-technical indicators are forward-looking, but that there is still room for improvement in terms of implementation paths, weight assignment, number of indicators, and index system. Based on these explorations, this study provides suggestions for aspects of principles and methods that could be used for the construction of similar standards in developing countries. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在分析城市环境时,城市一级的可持续性评估标准受到了很多关注。许多国家,特别是在发达国家,已经制定了衡量邻里,地区和城市在实现可持续发展目标方面的绩效的标准。在这项研究中,在绿色和可持续发展的范围内选择并分析了来自中国和美国的四个标准。中国新的绿色生态区评估标准(ASGE)旨在支持中国的新型城市化计划,从概念阶段到具体实施。 LEED(R)评级系统是ASGE发展的重要参考之一。通过比较ASGE及其借鉴的先进标准,本研究旨在评估ASGE在适应中国国情方面的工作。指出优点和缺点并提出改进建议。研究结果表明,ASGE的评级体系符合中国国情,一些非技术指标具有前瞻性,但在实施路径,权重分配,指标数量等方面仍有改进的余地以及索引系统。基于这些探索,本研究为可用于发展中国家类似标准构建的原则和方法的各个方面提供了建议。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2020年第1期|119622.1-119622.14|共14页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ Dept Architecture Xian Shanxi Peoples R China|Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab 1 Cyclotron Rd MS90-2121 Berkeley CA 94720 USA;

    Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab 1 Cyclotron Rd MS90-2121 Berkeley CA 94720 USA|Southeast Univ Sch Architecture Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab 1 Cyclotron Rd MS90-2121 Berkeley CA 94720 USA;

    China Soc Urban Studies China Green Bldg Council Beijing Peoples R China;

    China Acad Bldg Res Beijing Peoples R China|China Soc Urban Studies China Green Bldg Council Beijing Peoples R China;

    US Green Bldg Council Washington DC USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Sustainability assessment standards; City-level; Green buildings; Rating system; Comparative study; China;

    机译:可持续发展评估标准;市级;绿色建筑;评分系统;比较研究;中国;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 05:20:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号