首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Microalgae dewatering for biofuels: A comparative techno-economic assessment using single and two-stage technologies
【24h】

Microalgae dewatering for biofuels: A comparative techno-economic assessment using single and two-stage technologies

机译:生物燃料微藻脱水:使用单阶段和两阶段技术的比较技术经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Microalgae-based biofuels have the potential to replace fossil fuels and contribute towards carbon sequestration. However, the growth of this industry is challenged by the financial viability of scale-up at various production stages. Dewatering is a critical stage which accounts for 20-30% of biofuels' production costs, therefore a techno-economic assessment of two dewatering cases was conducted. The first case was a conventional clarifier-centrifuge dewatering system (Case 1), while the second case investigated a single stage dewatering approach, using the wet-end of a paper machine (Fourdrinier former; Case 2). Mass and energy balances were modelled at a process scale of 175 t/d to produce biomass with 25% dry substance content, from which the associated costs were calculated. The minimum selling price (MSP) to achieve a return of 12% at a corporate tax rate of 30% over a 20-year plant life, was AU$354.28/t and AU$59.68/t for Case 1 and Case 2 respectively. Electricity cost was 90% of operational expenditure for two-stage dewatering and 38% for single stage. Case 2 made a better investment case with an annual profit after tax of AU$131,020 and net present value (NPV) of AU$164 million, as against that of Case 1 with an annual profit after tax of AU$112,610 and NPV of AU$71 million. The single stage dewatering deserves further investigation to fully explore the cost reduction potentials. The adoption of low cost technologies with reduced energy use implies lower embedded GHG emissions and process costs when compared to conventional technologies. This is desired for the near-term actualization of sustainable and clean production pathways for microalgae based biofuels. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:基于微藻的生物燃料具有替代化石燃料并促进碳固存的潜力。但是,该行业的增长受到各个生产阶段扩大规模的财务可行性的挑战。脱水是关键阶段,占生物燃料生产成本的20-30%,因此对两个脱水案例进行了技术经济评估。第一种情况是常规的澄清池-离心脱水系统(案例1),而第二种情况是使用造纸机的湿端研究了单级脱水方法(Fourdrinier前者;案例2)。以175吨/天的生产规模对质量和能量平衡进行建模,以生产干物质含量为25%的生物质,并据此计算相关成本。案例1和案例2的最低销售价格(MSP)在20年的工厂使用期内以30%的公司税率实现12%的回报率,分别为354.28澳元/吨和59.68澳元/吨。电力成本为两阶段脱水的运营支出的90%,单阶段为38%。案例2是一个更好的投资案例,其年度税后利润为131,020澳元,净现值(NPV)为1.64亿澳元,而案例1的情况是,年度税后利润为112,610澳元,净现值为7,100万澳元。单级脱水值得进一步研究,以充分探索降低成本的潜力。与传统技术相比,采用降低能耗的低成本技术意味着更低的嵌入式温室气体排放和工艺成本。对于微藻基生物燃料的可持续和清洁生产途径的近期实现,这是期望的。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2019年第20期|325-336|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Chem Phys & Mech Engn, Biofuel Engine Res Facil, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia;

    Queensland Competit Author, GPO Box 2257, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia;

    Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Chem Phys & Mech Engn, Biofuel Engine Res Facil, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia;

    Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Chem Phys & Mech Engn, Biofuel Engine Res Facil, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Microalgae; Dewatering; Techno-economics; Centrifugation; Fourdrinier-former; Biofuels;

    机译:微藻;脱水;技术经济学;离心;傅里叶原核;生物燃料;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号