首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chinese political science >Choices for Chinese Political Science: Methodological Positivism or Methodological Pluralism?
【24h】

Choices for Chinese Political Science: Methodological Positivism or Methodological Pluralism?

机译:中国政治学的选择:方法论的实证主义还是方法论的多元论?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Like its American counterpart, Chinese political science is experiencing a similar concern regarding its societal relevance as it attempts to assess and focus on China's unique political and social concerns. Should Chinese political science tread the same path? Should it pursue a purely methodological positivist approach or should it engage in a more holistic and methodologically pluralistic approach such as that found in public administration? A mixed-methods approach, which includes both problem-driven research and theory-driven research, might be a better way to serve both the discipline and China.
机译:与美国同行一样,中国政治学也试图对其社会关联性进行类似的关注,因为它试图评估和关注中国独特的政治和社会关注。中国政治学应该走同样的道路吗?它应该采用纯粹的方法论实证主义方法还是应该采用更整体和方法论上的多元化方法,例如公共行政中的方法?包括问题驱动研究和理论驱动研究在内的混合方法可能是服务于该学科和中国的一种更好的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号