...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Change Management >Reflections: Good Practice, Not Rocket Science - Understanding Failures to Change After Extreme Events
【24h】

Reflections: Good Practice, Not Rocket Science - Understanding Failures to Change After Extreme Events

机译:反思:良好实践,而非火箭科学-了解极端事件后无法改变的失败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It is exciting to have a real crisis on your hands, when you have spent half your political life dealing with humdrum issues like the environment. Margaret Thatcher (on the Falklands campaign, 1982) The aim of this reflection is to identify a set of puzzles which have not been explored by change management researchers, have not been resolved by other approaches and where a change management perspective may be particularly valuable. These puzzles derive from the observation that, following an accident, crisis, disaster or other extreme event, the recommendations from investigations and inquiries are often not implemented. The failure to change can then lead to a repeat of that event. It cannot be presumed that receptivity to change in such circumstances is invariably high, or that change will be automatic and straightforward. The currently dominant perspective in this field views these problems in terms of organizational learning difficulties. In arguing the need for a complementary change management perspective, this article first illustrates the nature and consequences of these change failures, using public domain sources. The features that distinguish extreme from routine change contexts are then outlined, and the potential barriers to change in extreme contexts are explored. Finally, the value of a change management perspective is explored, suggesting new modes of researcher-organization collaboration to strengthen the contribution of research findings to practice in an area where effective change can literally save lives. View full textDownload full textKeywordsaccident, crisis, disaster, extreme event, extreme contextRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2011.597571
机译:当您花了一半的政治时间来处理诸如环境之类的单调乏味的问题时,面对真正的危机真是令人兴奋。玛格丽特·撒切尔(Margaret Thatcher)(在福克兰群岛运动中,1982年),其目的是找出一组变革管理研究人员未曾探索,未通过其他方法解决的难题,而变革管理的观点可能特别有价值。这些困惑源于以下观察结果:在发生事故,危机,灾难或其他极端事件之后,通常不会执行调查和询问的建议。更改失败会导致该事件重复发生。不能假定在这种情况下对变化的接受程度总是很高,否则变化将是自动而直接的。在该领域,目前的主流观点是从组织学习困难的角度来看待这些问题。在争论对补充变更管理观点的需求时,本文首先使用公共领域资源说明了这些变更失败的性质和后果。然后概述了区分极端变化与常规变化环境的功能,并探讨了极端变化中潜在的变化障碍。最后,探讨了变革管理观点的价值,提出了研究者与组织合作的新模式,以加强研究成果在有效改变可以挽救生命的领域中的实践贡献。查看全文下载全文关键字事故,危机,灾难,极端事件,极端上下文相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google ,more“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2011.597571

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号