首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Legislated Ethics or Ethics Education?: Faculty Views in the Post-Enron Era
【24h】

Legislated Ethics or Ethics Education?: Faculty Views in the Post-Enron Era

机译:立法的伦理还是伦理教育?:后安然时代的教师观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The tension between external forces for better ethics in organizations, represented by legislation such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), and the call for internal forces represented by increased educational coverage, has never been as apparent. This study examines business school faculty attitudes about recent corporate ethics lapses, including opinions about root causes, potential solutions, and ethics coverage in their courses. In assessing root causes, faculty point to a failure of systems such as legal/professional and management (external) and declining personal values (internal). We also found that faculty recommend external forces as a remedy more often than increased ethics educational coverage; we contextu-alize this finding with recent ethics education literature. We conclude by proposing that neither legislation nor ethics education alone are complete when addressing widespread unethical corporate acts and offer a multi-faceted approach to ethics educational opportunities.
机译:以萨班斯-奥克斯利法案(SOX)之类的立法为代表的外部力量在组织中提高道德操守之间的张力,以及以教育覆盖面扩大为代表的内部力量之间的张力从未如此明显。这项研究调查了商学院教师对近期公司道德准则失范的态度,包括对根本原因,潜在解决方案以及其课程中的道德准则的看法。在评估根本原因时,教师指出诸如法律/专业和管理(外部)和个人价值下降(内部)之类的系统失败。我们还发现,与增加道德教育的覆盖面相比,教师更经常建议使用外来力量作为一种补救措施。我们将这一发现与最新的道德教育文献联系起来。我们的结论是,当解决普遍存在的不道德的公司行为时,仅立法和道德教育都是不完整的,并为道德教育机会提供了多方面的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号