首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Moral and Instrumental Norms in Food Risk Communication
【24h】

Moral and Instrumental Norms in Food Risk Communication

机译:食品风险交流中的道德规范和工具规范

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The major normative recommendations in the literature on food risk communication can be summarized in the form of seven practical principles for such communication: (1) Be honest and open. (2) Disclose incentives and conflicts of interest. (3) Take all available relevant knowledge into consideration. (4) When possible, quantify risks. (5) Describe and explain uncertainties. (6) Take all the public's concerns into account. (7) Take the rights of individuals and groups seriously. We show that each of these proposed principles can be justified both in terms of more fundamental ethical principles and instrumentally in terms of the communicating agent's self-interest. The mechanisms of this concordance of justifications are discussed. It is argued that the concordance is specific for areas such as food risks in which agents such as companies and public authorities are highly dependent on the public's trust and confidence. The implications of these findings both for moral philosophy and for practical food risk communication are discussed.
机译:关于食品风险沟通的文献中的主要规范性建议可以通过以下七个实用原则进行总结:(1)诚实和开放。 (2)披露激励措施和利益冲突。 (3)考虑所有可用的相关知识。 (4)尽可能量化风险。 (5)描述和解释不确定性。 (6)考虑到所有公众的关注。 (7)认真对待个人和团体的权利。我们表明,无论是从更基本的道德原则来看,还是从沟通代理人的自身利益出发,这些提议的原则中的每一个都可以辩解。讨论了这种证明一致性的机制。有人认为,这种一致性特别适用于食品风险等领域,在这些领域中,公司和公共机构等代理人高度依赖公众的信任和信心。讨论了这些发现对道德哲学和实际食品风险沟通的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号