首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >The Impact of Ethical Leadership, the Internal Audit Function, and Moral Intensity on a Financial Reporting Decision
【24h】

The Impact of Ethical Leadership, the Internal Audit Function, and Moral Intensity on a Financial Reporting Decision

机译:道德领导,内部审计职能和道德强度对财务报告决策的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two elements of corporate governance—the strength of ethical executive leadership and the internal audit function (IAF hereafter)—provide guidance to accounting managers making decisions involving uncertainty. We examine the joint effect of these two factors, manipulated at two levels (strong, weak), in an experiment in which accounting professionals decide whether to book a questionable journal entry (i.e., a journal entry for which a reasonable business case can be made but there is no supporting documentation). We find that ethical leadership and the IAF interact to determine the likelihood that accountants book the entry. Specifically, accountants are less likely to book a questionable journal entry when there is a weak ethical leader and a strong IAF compared to all other conditions. In addition, we find that accountants question the appropriateness and ethicalness of the request to book an undocumented journal entry more in the weak ethical leader and strong IAF condition than in the other conditions. These results suggest that the IAF has a different impact on financial reporting decisions depending on the ethicalness of executive leadership and that a strong IAF may cause accountants to question the appropriateness and ethicalness of an undocumented journal entry when combined with weak ethical leadership. We also find that the interactive effect of ethical leadership and the IAF on an accountant's decision is fully mediated by his/her perception of the moral intensity of the issue. Thus, accountants, who perceive greater moral intensity associated with booking the entry, are less willing to do so.
机译:公司治理的两个要素-道德高管领导层的实力和内部审计职能(以下称IAF)-为会计经理做出涉及不确定性的决策提供指导。我们在一个实验中检查了这两个因素的共同作用,这两个因素在两个级别(强,弱)上操纵,在该实验中,会计专业人员决定是否预定有问题的日记帐分录(即,可以针对该日记帐分录做出合理的业务案例)但没有支持文档)。我们发现,道德领导层与IAF相互影响,以确定会计师预定条目的可能性。具体而言,与所有其他情况相比,如果道德领导者薄弱且IAF实力强,会计师就不太可能预订可疑的日记帐分录。此外,我们发现,相比于其他情况,在道德操守较弱和IAF状况较弱的情况下,会计师对预订无证日记帐分录的请求的适当性和道德性的质疑更多。这些结果表明,IAF取决于高管领导层的道德操守对财务报告决策产生不同的影响,而强大的IAF可能导致会计人员在缺乏道德领导力的情况下质疑无证日记账分录的适当性和道德操守。我们还发现,道德领导和IAF对会计师决策的互动影响完全由他/她对问题道德强度的理解所调节。因此,认为与预订该条目相关的道德强度更高的会计师不愿意这样做。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号