首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused?
【24h】

Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused?

机译:利益相关者:本质上是竞争还是困惑?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The concept of the 'stakeholder' has become central to business, yet there is no common consensus as to what the concept of a stakeholder means, with hundreds of different published definitions suggested. Whilst every concept is liable to be contested, for stakeholder research, this is problematic for both theoretical and empirical analysis. This article explores whether this lack of consensus is conceptual confusion, which would benefit from further debate to try to reach a higher degree of elucidation, or whether the stakeholder concept is essentially contested, rendering the quest to seek a singular definition unfeasible. The theory of essentially contested concepts was proposed by Gallie (Proc Aristot Soc 56:167-198, 1956). The seven criteria Gallie prescribes for evaluating essentially contested concepts are applied to the stakeholder concept. The analysis suggests that this concept is an essentially contested concept and this explains the degree of definitional variation.
机译:“利益相关者”的概念已成为业务的中心,但是对于利益相关者的概念意味着什么,尚未达成共识,并提出了数百种不同的公开定义。尽管每个概念都容易引起争议,但对于利益相关者的研究而言,这在理论和实证分析上都是有问题的。本文探讨了这种缺乏共识的情况是否是概念上的混乱,这将通过进一步的辩论来尝试达到更高的阐释水平,或者利益相关者的概念是否在本质上引起争议,从而寻求单一的定义是不可行的。 Gallie提出了本质上有争议的概念的理论(Proc Aristot Soc 56:167-198,1956年)。 Gallie规定的用于评估本质上有争议的概念的七个标准被应用于利益相关者概念。分析表明,该概念本质上是一个有争议的概念,这解释了定义变化的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号