首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the British Interplanetary Scoiety >REPLY TO THE THREE DOCUMENTS AGAINST METI
【24h】

REPLY TO THE THREE DOCUMENTS AGAINST METI

机译:回复关于METI的三个文件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This is a reply to the three other documents against METI. Some of the arguments listed in those papers were addressed in the ones in favour of METI and it is useless to repeat them here. We do not know the level of the alien technology. To be on the safe side, a moratorium on METI would imply limiting any type of human activity that can bring attention to us. If we assume that they have the capacity to come here and threaten us, then anything is possible. We have the technology to detect planets around other stars. Assuming that an alien civilisation is technologically more advanced than us then it could at least do what we do and better. It could have detected us through our atmosphere biosignature and even our industrial activities. Then we are back to the Fermi Paradox: where are they?
机译:这是针对METI的其他三个文件的答复。这些论文中列出的一些论点在赞成METI的论点中得到了解决,在此不再赘述。我们不知道外星技术的水平。为了安全起见,暂停执行METI意味着限制可以引起我们注意的任何类型的人类活动。如果我们认为他们有能力来这里威胁我们,那么一切皆有可能。我们拥有探测其他恒星周围行星的技术。假设外来文明在技术上比我们先进,那么它至少可以做我们所做的事情,并且做得更好。它可以通过我们的大气生物特征甚至我们的工业活动检测到我们。然后我们回到费米悖论:它们在哪里?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号