...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Behavioral Decision Making >Seeing Is Not Enough: Manipulating Choice Options Causes Focusing And Preference Change In Multiattribute Risky Decision-making
【24h】

Seeing Is Not Enough: Manipulating Choice Options Causes Focusing And Preference Change In Multiattribute Risky Decision-making

机译:眼见不到:操纵选择权会导致多属性风险决策的重点和偏好变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We show that preferences depend on the attributes that can be directly manipulated when people need to integrate multiple sources of information because direct manipulation causes focusing bias. This effect appears even when all relevant information is simultaneously and explicitly presented at the time the decisions are made. Participants decided how much to save, what investment risk to take and observed the future financial consequences in terms of the mean and variability of the expected retirement income. Participants who manipulated only the future income distribution saved more and took less risk. This effect disappears when the risk-related variables are removed, which indicates that task complexity is a mediator of such focusing effects. A more balanced trade-off between the choice attributes was selected when all attributes were manipulated. However, when there is a dichotomy between manipulating versus observing choice attributes, then decisions were based mostly on the manipulated attributes.
机译:我们表明,偏好取决于人们在需要集成多种信息源时可以直接操纵的属性,因为直接操纵会导致聚焦偏差。即使在决策时同时并明确地呈现了所有相关信息,也会出现这种效果。参与者决定节省多少,承担什么投资风险,并根据预期退休收入的均值和可变性观察了未来的财务后果。仅操纵未来收入分配的参与者节省了更多资金,风险更低。当除去与风险相关的变量时,这种影响消失了,这表明任务复杂性是这种集中效应的中介。当操纵所有属性时,会在选择属性之间选择一个更平衡的权衡。但是,如果在操纵属性和观察选择属性之间存在二分法,则决策主要基于操纵属性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号