...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Behavioral Decision Making >Tracing Attitude Expressions: An Eye-Tracking Study
【24h】

Tracing Attitude Expressions: An Eye-Tracking Study

机译:追踪态度表达:一项眼动研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Attitudes represent object evaluations, comprising complex underlying cognitive and affective knowledge structures. When people are asked to judge an object, they can use their primary response (i.e., the immediate object-evaluation linkage) or underlying affective and cognitive knowledge structures. In many situations, a primary response satisfices, but if not, more elaboration is required. Both processes are fundamentally different but may lead to the same attitude. For monitoring underlying processes during attitude expression, we developed an innovative eye-tracking procedure using eye-gaze on response scale options. This procedure was applied in three studies to identify the extent to which elaboration differs for attitude objects with weak or strong, univalent or mixed object evaluations (i.e., univalent, neutral and ambivalent). In Study 1, the overall judgment preceded processing of more specific affective and cognitive linkage evaluations. In Studies 2 and 3, the order was reversed, and affective and cognitive bases were assessed prior to overall attitude outcomes. For attitude objects with strong univalent or strong mixed object evaluations, we found similar outcomes on underlying processes. For weak object evaluations, cognition was found to be more predictive and easily accessible if an overall judgment was required first; affect for these objects was more predictive if people had to elaborate on affect and cognition first. We concluded that both affective and cognitive attitudes may require substantial elaboration, albeit in different situations. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:态度代表对象评估,包括复杂的基础认知和情感知识结构。当要求人们判断一个对象时,他们可以使用其主要反应(即直接的对象评估链接)或潜在的情感和认知知识结构。在许多情况下,主要的回应是令人满意的,但如果不是,则需要更多的阐述。这两个过程在根本上是不同的,但可能导致相同的态度。为了监视态度表达过程中的基本过程,我们开发了一种创新的眼动追踪程序,使用了对反应量表选项的注视。在三项研究中均采用了此程序,以确定对于弱或强,单价或混合对象评估(即单价,中立和矛盾)的姿态对象,其细化程度有所不同。在研究1中,总体判断先于更具体的情感和认知联系评估。在研究2和3中,顺序颠倒了,在总体态度结果之前评估了情感和认知基础。对于具有强单价或强混合对象评估的态度对象,我们在基础过程中发现了相似的结果。对于较弱的对象评估,如果首先需要整体判断,则认知会更具预测性,并且容易获得。如果人们必须首先阐述情感和认知,则对这些对象的情感更具预测性。我们得出的结论是,尽管在不同情况下,情感态度和认知态度都可能需要大量阐述。版权所有(c)2015 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号