首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Generalized runs tests to detect randomness in hedge funds returns
【24h】

Generalized runs tests to detect randomness in hedge funds returns

机译:广义运行测试以检测对冲基金收益的随机性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The major contribution of this paper is to make use of generalized runs tests (Cho and White, 2011) to analyze the randomness, i.e. the lack of persistence, in both absolute and relative returns of hedge funds. We find that about 42% of the HFR universe exhibit iid absolute returns over the period spanning 2000 to 2012. These funds are mainly found in proportions within the Macro and Equity Hedge strategies. A similar result holds for relative returns. We also find that funds having non-iid returns often exhibit ARCH effects and structural breaks, with largest breaks located within financial crises. Also, only a small percentage displays persistence in their relative performance, 8.2% to 16.7% of the universe, mainly found in proportions within the Relative Value and Event-Driven strategies. The robustness of results is challenged by implementing the tests on a crisis-free period. We find similar results for absolute returns. For relative ones, differences appear across strategies and benchmarks, but still both ARCH and breaks are present. Our work contributes to the hedge fund literature in terms of methodology, portfolio allocation, and performance measurement. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文的主要贡献是利用广义运行检验(Cho and White,2011)来分析对冲基金绝对收益和相对收益的随机性,即缺乏持久性。我们发现,在2000年至2012年期间,大约有42%的HFR表现出同等的绝对收益。这些资金主要是在Macro and Equity Hedge策略中按比例找到的。相对回报也有类似的结果。我们还发现,具有非固定收益回报的基金通常表现出ARCH效应和结构性断裂,其中最大的断裂位于金融危机内。同样,只有一小部分显示其相对性能的持久性,占整个宇宙的8.2%至16.7%,主要是在相对价值和事件驱动策略中所占的比例。在无危机时期实施测试会挑战结果的鲁棒性。我们发现绝对收益的相似结果。对于相对而言,策略和基准之间会出现差异,但仍然存在ARCH和Breaks。我们的工作为方法,投资组合分配和绩效评估方面的对冲基金文献做出了贡献。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号