首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archival Organization >The Permanence of Provenance: The “Two Traditions” and the American Archival Profession
【24h】

The Permanence of Provenance: The “Two Traditions” and the American Archival Profession

机译:种源的持久性:“两个传统”和美国档案专业

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the claims that the American archival profession owes its existence to the unique combination of a “historical manuscripts tradition” and a “public archives tradition” over the course of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It also evaluates the differences and similarities between the traditions’ theories of practice and ideologies in early twentieth century American writings on archives and the Society of American Archivists’ “basic manuals” that defined much professional theory and practice in the late twentieth century. These findings have contemporary implications, as those seeking to define modern archival theory often erroneously use the origins of the American archival profession to support their arguments.View full textDownload full textKEYWORDSpublic archives, historical manuscripts, Society of American Archivists, SAA, Waldo Leland, John Franklin Jameson, Public Archives Commission, PACRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2010.486754
机译:本文考察了声称美国档案专业存在的说法,认为其存在于19世纪和20世纪,是“历史手稿传统”和“公共档案馆传统”的独特结合。它还评估了二十世纪初美国档案馆中的实践和意识形态传统的理论之间的异同,以及在后期定义了许多专业理论和实践的美国档案管理员协会的“基本手册”。二十世纪。这些发现具有当代意义,因为那些试图定义现代档案理论的人经常错误地使用美国档案专业的起源来支持他们的论点。查看全文下载全文关键词公共档案,历史手稿,美国档案管理员协会,SAA,Waldo Leland,John富兰克林·詹姆森(PAC)公共档案委员会ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2010.486754

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号