首页> 外文期刊>Journal of architectural and planning research >CONFRONTING THE TERRAIN OF POLITICS IN ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE: ASSESSING STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
【24h】

CONFRONTING THE TERRAIN OF POLITICS IN ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE: ASSESSING STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES

机译:解决建筑实践中的政治问题:评估优势和劣势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Architects and architecture students may not know how to deal with the political situations they face or will face in their practice. They need a better understanding of the terrain of political strengths and weaknesses they may encounter in such circumstances because the actions they take can serve to either maintain or challenge existing political systems. Likewise, their political actions are oriented to serving themselves (self), serving others (social orientation), or meeting public requirements (social obligation). Circumstances arise that force architects and students to confront the terrain of political strengths and weaknesses. Understanding this terrain can better situate them to use methods of practice to identify and solve problems.
机译:建筑师和建筑专业的学生可能不知道如何应对自己在实践中将面临或将要面对的政治局势。他们需要更好地了解在这种情况下可能会遇到的政治优势和劣势,因为他们采取的行动可以起到维持或挑战现有政治制度的作用。同样,他们的政治行为是为了服务自己(自己),服务他人(社会取向)或满足公共要求(社会义务)。出现了迫使建筑师和学生面对政治优势和劣势的情况。了解该地形可以使他们更好地利用实践方法来识别和解决问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of architectural and planning research》 |2013年第3期|244-263|共20页
  • 作者

    James M. Mayo; Nils Gore;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Urban Planning, 317 Marvin Hall, 1465 Jayhawk Blvd., University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA;

    University of Kansas and a licensed architect;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号